^TNX vs. XAU.TO

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO).

Performance

^TNX vs. XAU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

^TNX vs. XAU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^TNX Treasury Yield 10 Years	3.60%	-8.97%	18.29%	-0.34%	156.55%	64.89%	-52.21%	-28.56%	11.68%	-1.68%
XAU.TO Goldmoney Inc.	54.70%	41.95%	-9.20%	-5.47%	-20.36%	-19.25%	34.73%	14.54%	-74.19%	104.35%

Different Trading Currencies

^TNX is traded in USD, while XAU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XAU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^TNX achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly lower than XAU.TO's 54.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ^TNX has outperformed XAU.TO with an annualized return of 9.26%, while XAU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -2.12% annualized return.

^TNX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 6.34%
• YTD: 3.60%
• 6M: 5.50%
• 1Y: 2.79%
• 3Y*: 7.93%
• 5Y*: 20.77%
• 10Y*: 9.26%

XAU.TO

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -11.79%
• YTD: 54.70%
• 6M: 49.95%
• 1Y: 104.54%
• 3Y*: 17.43%
• 5Y*: -1.24%
• 10Y*: -2.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

^TNX vs. XAU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^TNX

^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 20
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

XAU.TO

XAU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
XAU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
XAU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
XAU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
XAU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
XAU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^TNX vs. XAU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^TNX	XAU.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	2.63	-2.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.36	3.56	-3.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.46	-0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.27	4.47	-4.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.45	10.08	-9.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^TNX vs. XAU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^TNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the XAU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^TNX and XAU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^TNX	XAU.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	2.63	-2.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	-0.03	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	-0.04	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.01	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between ^TNX and XAU.TO is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Drawdowns

^TNX vs. XAU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^TNX drawdown since its inception was -93.78%, which is greater than XAU.TO's maximum drawdown of -84.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^TNX and XAU.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	^TNX	XAU.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.78%	-83.39%	-10.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.99%	-23.48%	+9.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.74%	-60.06%	+28.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.57%	-83.39%	-1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.24%	-57.87%	+11.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.38%	-63.60%	+12.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.40%	10.45%	-2.05%

Volatility

^TNX vs. XAU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) is 5.90%, while Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO) has a volatility of 10.56%. This indicates that ^TNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^TNX	XAU.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.90%	10.56%	-4.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.53%	33.09%	-22.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.76%	39.92%	-22.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.94%	40.09%	-7.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.17%	52.18%	-4.01%