PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XAU.TO vs. PHYS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


XAU.TOPHYS
YTD Return6.66%24.11%
1Y Return2.33%28.54%
3Y Return (Ann)-13.05%10.44%
5Y Return (Ann)-3.70%10.95%
10Y Return (Ann)191.19%7.23%
Sharpe Ratio0.032.01
Sortino Ratio0.322.62
Omega Ratio1.041.35
Calmar Ratio0.013.39
Martin Ratio0.1312.21
Ulcer Index9.56%2.42%
Daily Std Dev35.56%14.71%
Max Drawdown-83.45%-48.16%
Current Drawdown-78.62%-8.73%

Fundamentals


XAU.TOPHYS
Market CapCA$111.20M$8.17B
EPS-CA$1.37$0.10
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$65.38M$66.11M
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$20.53M$47.47M
EBITDA (TTM)CA$17.50M$1.47B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between XAU.TO and PHYS is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XAU.TO achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly lower than PHYS's 24.11% return. Over the past 10 years, XAU.TO has outperformed PHYS with an annualized return of 191.19%, while PHYS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.23% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.30%
7.10%
XAU.TO
PHYS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAU.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XAU.TO, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XAU.TO, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XAU.TO, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XAU.TO, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XAU.TO, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.29
PHYS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.49
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 3.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PHYS, currently valued at 11.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.31

XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAU.TO and PHYS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.08
1.89
XAU.TO
PHYS

Dividends

XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither XAU.TO nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019
XAU.TO
Goldmoney Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2,139,037.43%
PHYS
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAU.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.45%, which is greater than PHYS's maximum drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAU.TO and PHYS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-80.37%
-8.73%
XAU.TO
PHYS

Volatility

XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison

Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.93% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) at 5.67%. This indicates that XAU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.93%
5.67%
XAU.TO
PHYS

Financials

XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goldmoney Inc. and Sprott Physical Gold Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. XAU.TO values in CAD, PHYS values in USD