XAU.TO vs. PHYS
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS).
Performance
XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAU.TO Goldmoney Inc. | 56.09% | 35.45% | -1.41% | -7.57% | -14.65% | -19.84% | 32.09% | 9.10% | -72.02% | 91.16% |
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 10.71% | 56.43% | 37.29% | 10.49% | 5.19% | -5.70% | 21.80% | 12.33% | 5.61% | 5.60% |
Different Trading Currencies
XAU.TO is traded in CAD, while PHYS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PHYS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
XAU.TO:
CA$215.82M
PHYS:
$17.15B
XAU.TO:
CA$3.05
PHYS:
$12.73
XAU.TO:
5.34
PHYS:
2.84
XAU.TO:
0.05
PHYS:
0.03
XAU.TO:
1.26
PHYS:
7.08
XAU.TO:
1.12
PHYS:
1.07
XAU.TO:
CA$169.98M
PHYS:
$2.38B
XAU.TO:
CA$50.32M
PHYS:
$4.38B
XAU.TO:
CA$45.86M
PHYS:
$5.95B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAU.TO achieves a 56.09% return, which is significantly higher than PHYS's 8.78% return. Over the past 10 years, XAU.TO has underperformed PHYS with an annualized return of -2.05%, while PHYS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.17% annualized return.
XAU.TO
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- 56.09%
- 6M
- 53.30%
- 1Y
- 96.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- -2.05%
PHYS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.43%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 19.17%
- 1Y
- 42.75%
- 3Y*
- 33.12%
- 5Y*
- 23.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAU.TO vs. PHYS — Risk / Return Rank
XAU.TO
PHYS
XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAU.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | 1.60 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.53 | 1.99 | +1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.30 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.43 | 2.34 | +2.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 8.14 | +1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAU.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 1.60 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 1.42 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 | 0.91 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.58 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between XAU.TO and PHYS is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison
Neither XAU.TO nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAU.TO Goldmoney Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% |
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAU.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.39%, which is greater than PHYS's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAU.TO and PHYS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAU.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.39% | -48.16% | -35.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.48% | -19.35% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.06% | -21.80% | -38.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.39% | -23.75% | -59.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.08% | -11.80% | -46.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.61% | -21.07% | -42.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.44% | 5.38% | +5.06% |
Volatility
XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison
Goldmoney Inc. (XAU.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.88% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) at 10.24%. This indicates that XAU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XAU.TO | PHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.88% | 10.24% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.02% | 24.07% | +7.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.58% | 26.87% | +11.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.78% | 16.80% | +21.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.29% | 15.66% | +35.63% |
Financials
XAU.TO vs. PHYS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goldmoney Inc. and Sprott Physical Gold Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities