PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^TNX vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^TNX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^TNX achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ^TNX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 10.69%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 68.59% annualized return.


^TNX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
7.35%
6M
6.86%
1Y
1.02%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
23.29%
10Y*
10.69%

NVDA

1D
3.54%
1M
-5.60%
YTD
14.05%
6M
20.66%
1Y
49.84%
3Y*
70.84%
5Y*
64.29%
10Y*
68.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^TNX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^TNX
Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index
7.35%-8.97%18.29%-0.34%156.55%64.89%-52.21%-28.56%11.68%-1.68%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
14.05%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ^TNX and NVDA is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.15

The correlation between ^TNX and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (5 years) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^TNX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^TNX
^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^TNX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^TNXNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.24

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

2.48

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

5.89

-5.74

^TNX vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^TNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^TNX and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^TNX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^TNX drawdown since its inception was -96.85%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^TNX and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^TNXNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.85%

-89.72%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-20.21%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

-36.88%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.41%

-66.34%

+38.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.57%

-66.34%

-18.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.79%

-9.77%

-62.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.00%

-36.17%

-18.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.59%

8.48%

-1.89%

Volatility

^TNX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX) is 5.03%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.97%. This indicates that ^TNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^TNXNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

12.97%

-7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.72%

26.83%

-16.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

35.13%

-20.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.36%

51.80%

-19.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.98%

49.87%

-1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


^TNX and NVDA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (12.97%) compared to ^TNX (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^TNX dropped -96.85% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^TNX and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer