PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SP100 vs. ^IXIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SP100 vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 100 Index (^SP100) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^SP100 vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^SP100
S&P 100 Index
-6.49%18.76%29.25%30.83%-22.12%27.55%19.30%29.47%-5.86%19.34%
^IXIC
NASDAQ Composite
-6.03%20.36%28.64%43.42%-33.10%21.39%43.64%35.23%-3.88%28.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SP100 achieves a -6.49% return, which is significantly lower than ^IXIC's -6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SP100 has underperformed ^IXIC with an annualized return of 13.32%, while ^IXIC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.


^SP100

1D
0.73%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
-6.49%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
17.96%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
13.32%

^IXIC

1D
1.16%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
-6.03%
6M
-4.02%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
16.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^SP100 vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SP100
^SP100 Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
^SP100 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP100 Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP100 Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP100 Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP100 Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

^IXIC
^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SP100 vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 100 Index (^SP100) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^SP100^IXICDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.08

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

1.68

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.98

-0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.98

7.07

-1.10

^SP100 vs. ^IXIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SP100 Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SP100 and ^IXIC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^SP100^IXICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.08

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.45

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.73

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.51

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ^SP100 and ^IXIC is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^SP100 vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SP100 drawdown since its inception was -61.31%, smaller than the maximum ^IXIC drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SP100 and ^IXIC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^SP100^IXICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.31%

-77.93%

+16.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.08%

-13.26%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.23%

-36.40%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.53%

-36.40%

+4.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.80%

-8.84%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.71%

-21.46%

+8.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.71%

-0.62%

Volatility

^SP100 vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 100 Index (^SP100) is 5.63%, while NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that ^SP100 experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^SP100^IXICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

7.06%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

13.09%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.34%

23.33%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

22.44%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

21.97%

-3.53%