^SIXM vs. ^SIXT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Financial Select Sector Index (^SIXM) and Technology Select Sector Index (^SIXT).

Performance

^SIXM vs. ^SIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Financial Select Sector Index (^SIXM) and Technology Select Sector Index (^SIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

^SIXM vs. ^SIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^SIXM Financial Select Sector Index	-9.80%	13.32%	28.43%	9.94%	-12.35%	32.55%	-4.10%	29.17%	-14.66%	20.03%
^SIXT Technology Select Sector Index	-6.28%	23.84%	20.79%	54.58%	-28.72%	34.18%	42.21%	48.04%	-2.96%	32.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SIXM achieves a -9.80% return, which is significantly lower than ^SIXT's -6.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SIXM has underperformed ^SIXT with an annualized return of 10.38%, while ^SIXT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.

^SIXM

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: -9.80%
• 6M: -7.47%
• 1Y: -0.71%
• 3Y*: 15.38%
• 5Y*: 7.49%
• 10Y*: 10.38%

^SIXT

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: -3.23%
• YTD: -6.28%
• 6M: -5.19%
• 1Y: 29.67%
• 3Y*: 21.33%
• 5Y*: 14.77%
• 10Y*: 19.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

^SIXM vs. ^SIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SIXM

^SIXM Risk / Return Rank: 12
^SIXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
^SIXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
^SIXM Omega Ratio Rank: 12
^SIXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
^SIXM Martin Ratio Rank: 11

^SIXT

^SIXT Risk / Return Rank: 75
^SIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
^SIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
^SIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
^SIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
^SIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SIXM vs. ^SIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Financial Select Sector Index (^SIXM) and Technology Select Sector Index (^SIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^SIXM	^SIXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	1.10	-1.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	1.67	-1.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.23	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	1.90	-2.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.34	6.05	-6.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^SIXM vs. ^SIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SIXM Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the ^SIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SIXM and ^SIXT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^SIXM	^SIXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05	1.10	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.60	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.81	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.81	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between ^SIXM and ^SIXT is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Drawdowns

^SIXM vs. ^SIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SIXM drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than ^SIXT's maximum drawdown of -33.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SIXM and ^SIXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	^SIXM	^SIXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.30%	-33.93%	-18.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.06%	-16.12%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.95%	-33.93%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.13%	-33.93%	-9.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.30%	-11.24%	-1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.60%	-5.04%	-3.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	5.06%	-0.34%

Volatility

^SIXM vs. ^SIXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Financial Select Sector Index (^SIXM) is 4.75%, while Technology Select Sector Index (^SIXT) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that ^SIXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^SIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^SIXM	^SIXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	8.17%	-3.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.36%	16.59%	-5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.22%	27.22%	-8.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.68%	24.89%	-6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.29%	24.48%	-2.19%