PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SIXM vs. ^SIXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SIXM vs. ^SIXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Financial Select Sector Index (^SIXM) and Energy Select Sector Index (^SIXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SIXM achieves a -6.30% return, which is significantly lower than ^SIXE's 28.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SIXM has outperformed ^SIXE with an annualized return of 10.44%, while ^SIXE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.19% annualized return.


^SIXM

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
-6.30%
6M
-2.66%
1Y
0.89%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
10.44%

^SIXE

1D
1.10%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
28.71%
6M
28.69%
1Y
40.36%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
16.09%
10Y*
6.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^SIXM vs. ^SIXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^SIXM
Financial Select Sector Index
-6.30%13.32%28.43%9.94%-12.35%32.55%-4.10%29.17%-14.66%20.03%
^SIXE
Energy Select Sector Index
28.71%4.38%2.25%-4.12%58.40%46.21%-36.46%7.95%-20.48%-3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ^SIXM and ^SIXE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between ^SIXM and ^SIXE has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Financial Select Sector Index

Energy Select Sector Index

Often compared with ^SIXE:
^SIXE vs. SPY^SIXE vs. ^SIXT

Return for Risk

^SIXM vs. ^SIXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SIXM
^SIXM Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
^SIXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SIXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SIXM Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
^SIXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SIXM Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

^SIXE
^SIXE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^SIXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SIXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SIXE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
^SIXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SIXE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SIXM vs. ^SIXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Financial Select Sector Index (^SIXM) and Energy Select Sector Index (^SIXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^SIXM^SIXEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

1.98

-1.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.19

2.58

-2.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.32

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

3.46

-3.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.22

9.88

-9.66

^SIXM vs. ^SIXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SIXM Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the ^SIXE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SIXM and ^SIXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^SIXM^SIXEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

1.98

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.62

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.21

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.19

+0.18

Drawdowns

^SIXM vs. ^SIXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SIXM drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, smaller than the maximum ^SIXE drawdown of -75.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SIXM and ^SIXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^SIXM^SIXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.30%

-75.97%

+23.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.06%

-12.16%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

-21.94%

+6.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.95%

-26.25%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

-69.16%

+26.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.89%

-7.97%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-21.27%

+12.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

4.26%

+1.59%

Volatility

^SIXM vs. ^SIXE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Financial Select Sector Index (^SIXM) is 3.05%, while Energy Select Sector Index (^SIXE) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that ^SIXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^SIXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^SIXM^SIXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

8.00%

-4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

16.51%

-5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.15%

20.50%

-6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.58%

26.04%

-7.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.26%

29.80%

-7.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


^SIXM and ^SIXE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^SIXE has higher volatility (8.00%) compared to ^SIXM (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^SIXM dropped -52.30% vs ^SIXE's -75.97%.

^SIXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^SIXM and ^SIXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer