PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SIXM vs. JPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SIXM vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Financial Select Sector Index (^SIXM) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^SIXM vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^SIXM
Financial Select Sector Index
-9.80%13.32%28.43%9.94%-12.35%32.55%-4.10%29.17%-14.66%20.03%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-7.92%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SIXM achieves a -9.80% return, which is significantly lower than JPM's -7.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SIXM has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 10.38%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 20.50% annualized return.


^SIXM

1D
2.13%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
-9.80%
6M
-7.47%
1Y
-0.71%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
10.38%

JPM

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
-7.92%
6M
-4.04%
1Y
23.71%
3Y*
34.51%
5Y*
16.89%
10Y*
20.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^SIXM vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SIXM
^SIXM Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
^SIXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SIXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SIXM Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
^SIXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SIXM Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SIXM vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Financial Select Sector Index (^SIXM) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^SIXMJPMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.05

0.94

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.07

1.34

-1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.19

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

1.48

-1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.34

4.00

-4.34

^SIXM vs. JPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SIXM Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SIXM and JPM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^SIXMJPMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

0.94

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.70

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.75

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.34

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ^SIXM and JPM is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^SIXM vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SIXM drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, smaller than the maximum JPM drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SIXM and JPM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^SIXMJPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.30%

-76.16%

+23.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.06%

-15.47%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.95%

-38.77%

+11.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

-43.63%

+0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.30%

-11.72%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.60%

-17.66%

+9.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.72%

5.72%

-1.00%

Volatility

^SIXM vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Financial Select Sector Index (^SIXM) is 4.75%, while JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that ^SIXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^SIXMJPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

6.28%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

17.19%

-5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

25.24%

-6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.68%

24.34%

-5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

27.38%

-5.09%