PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for 1

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 13, 2026, the 1 returned 11.22% Year-To-Date and 11.62% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.50%-0.17%8.56%8.85%22.93%19.37%11.84%13.61%
Portfolio
1
1.62%2.72%11.22%12.75%17.53%18.08%9.27%11.62%
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
-0.06%1.84%1.01%2.27%2.33%9.40%5.15%7.44%
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
3.33%3.54%22.33%24.33%34.54%28.83%13.78%16.39%
XDWH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
-0.35%3.87%-1.95%-0.50%10.18%5.78%4.27%8.38%
XDWS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C
-0.40%0.13%7.05%7.21%5.80%7.43%4.79%6.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 5, 2014, 1's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.69%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 8.4 years.

Historically, 67% of months were positive and 33% were negative. The best month was May 2015 with a return of +23.8%, while the worst month was Jun 2015 at -20.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 14 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, 1 closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was May 14, 2015 with a return of +26.9%, while the worst single day was Jun 4, 2015 at -20.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.44%3.17%-7.27%8.39%3.93%1.72%11.22%
20254.39%0.56%-1.84%1.64%4.00%2.24%-1.26%1.72%2.08%-0.61%1.58%0.75%16.14%
20243.79%4.36%3.59%-3.54%2.90%3.22%1.41%3.09%1.07%-1.16%3.35%-4.01%19.10%
20230.54%-3.24%2.47%3.15%-4.26%4.27%1.75%-1.00%-3.38%-2.04%6.71%3.94%8.54%
2022-7.27%-1.11%5.00%-6.68%-2.21%-5.49%3.70%-2.53%-6.08%6.39%5.54%-1.57%-12.88%
2021-0.42%-1.34%2.62%4.64%0.51%1.09%2.40%2.32%-3.74%4.48%-1.60%3.23%14.74%

Benchmark Metrics

1 has an annualized alpha of 3.00%, beta of 0.45, and R2 of 0.14 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 05, 2014.

  • This portfolio participated in 84.82% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 67.77% of its upside - more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • Beta of 0.45 may look defensive, but with R2 of 0.14 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index - low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R2 of 0.14 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index - capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
3.00%
Beta
0.45
0.14
Upside Capture
67.77%
Downside Capture
84.82%

Expense Ratio

1 has an expense ratio of 0.25%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

1 ranks 34 for risk / return — below 34% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


1 Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
1 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1 Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
1 Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
1 Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
1 Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.65

1.86

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.52

2.53

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.53

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

11.37

-1.94


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
13
0.290.441.050.410.98
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
66
1.872.831.342.9212.11
XDWH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
22
0.711.141.130.962.40
XDWS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C
16
0.460.731.090.601.29

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

The current 1 Sharpe ratio is 1.65 as of Jun 13, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.54 to 2.41, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 1 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield


1 doesn't pay dividends

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 1 was 32.68%, occurring on Jan 20, 2016. Recovery took 367 trading sessions.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

2016 bear market2016
-32.68%Jan 2016
1y 4mo1y 5mo
2y 9moSep 2014 - Jun 2017
COVID crash2020
-29.42%Mar 2020
1mo 2d4mo 27d
5mo 29dFeb 2020 - Aug 2020
Bear market2022
-22.16%Sep 2022
8mo 29d1y 4mo
2y 1moDec 2021 - Feb 2024
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-13.68%Dec 2018
2mo 26d4mo
6mo 26dOct 2018 - Apr 2019
2025 selloff2025
-12.46%Apr 2025
1mo 20d1mo 4d
2mo 24dFeb 2025 - May 2025

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.44, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your allocation shows noticeable concentration: a few holdings carry significantly more weight than the rest. Rebalancing toward more even weights — or adding less correlated assets — could reduce risk.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.28

1.22

1.17

1.16

1.28

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.28, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

1 correlation to the S&P 500 Index

1 has a 0.64 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2014

0.57


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. XDEM.L has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.57, while XDWS.DE has the lowest at 0.36.

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. 1. XDEM.L has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.93, while XDWS.DE has the lowest at 0.71.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

XDWS.DEXDWH.DEXDEM.LXDEB.DE
XDWS.DE1.000.680.510.82
XDWH.DE0.681.000.620.80
XDEM.L0.510.621.000.67
XDEB.DE0.820.800.671.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 5, 2014
Diversification Analysis

Find what 1 is missing

See which holdings overlap, where 1 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification