PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEB.DE is traded in EUR, while XDEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.DE achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.L's 24.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.DE has underperformed XDEM.L with an annualized return of 7.10%, while XDEM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.02% annualized return.


XDEB.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
3.14%
YTD
2.60%
6M
3.81%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
7.10%

XDEM.L

1D
3.41%
1M
4.86%
YTD
24.21%
6M
26.16%
1Y
34.77%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
14.82%
10Y*
16.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
2.60%-1.27%17.84%3.65%-4.26%24.29%-6.66%26.15%2.01%3.04%
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
24.21%6.65%39.28%8.13%-12.80%23.13%17.40%31.22%1.02%15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.DE and XDEM.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2014

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between XDEB.DE and XDEM.L has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEM.L
XDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDEB.DEXDEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.36

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

3.78

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

14.71

-13.51

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.DE and XDEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.56%, smaller than the maximum XDEM.L drawdown of -49.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.DE and XDEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEB.DEXDEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.56%

-49.06%

+20.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.31%

-9.15%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.02%

-22.76%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

-22.76%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.56%

-30.16%

+1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.73%

-0.15%

-5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-15.47%

+8.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.36%

-0.34%

Volatility

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) is 2.25%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that XDEB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEB.DEXDEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

6.90%

-4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.52%

14.99%

-9.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.84%

17.45%

-9.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.16%

22.19%

-12.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.74%

22.80%

-10.06%

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDEB.DE and XDEM.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEB.DE vs. XDEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.DE nor XDEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEB.DE and XDEM.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.DE and XDEM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XDEB.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XDEM.L is Momentum. XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.DE and XDEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer