XDWH.DE vs. XDEB.DE
XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and XDEB.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XDEB.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE returned 8.03%/yr vs 7.10%/yr for XDEB.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XDWH.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.DE achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than XDEB.DE's 2.60% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE has outperformed XDEB.DE with an annualized return of 8.03%, while XDEB.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 10.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
XDEB.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
XDWH.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -0.42% | 2.20% | 7.45% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 30.30% | 2.70% | 27.21% | 5.98% | 5.52% |
XDEB.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 2.60% | -1.27% | 17.84% | 3.65% | -4.26% | 24.29% | -6.66% | 26.15% | 2.01% | 3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.DE and XDEB.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2014 | 0.81 |
The correlation between XDWH.DE and XDEB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWH.DE vs. XDEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWH.DE
XDEB.DE
XDWH.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDWH.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.06 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 0.46 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.61 | 1.20 | +1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDWH.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, which is greater than XDEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.DE and XDEB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWH.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.65% | -28.56% | -12.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -5.31% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.11% | -13.02% | -8.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.11% | -13.02% | -8.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.06% | -28.56% | +2.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -5.73% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -6.79% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 2.02% | +1.77% |
Volatility
XDWH.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) at 2.25%. This indicates that XDWH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWH.DE | XDEB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 2.25% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 5.52% | +3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.76% | 7.84% | +5.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 10.16% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 12.74% | +2.86% |
XDWH.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDWH.DE and XDEB.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWH.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.DE nor XDEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWH.DE and XDEB.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE and XDEB.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XDWH.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XDEB.DE is Global Equities. XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and DWS.
Find the right allocation for XDWH.DE and XDEB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer