XDWH.DE vs. XDEM.L
XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) and XDEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XDEM.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE returned 8.03%/yr vs 16.02%/yr for XDEM.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XDWH.DE vs. XDEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDWH.DE is traded in EUR, while XDEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWH.DE achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.L's 24.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWH.DE has underperformed XDEM.L with an annualized return of 8.03%, while XDEM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.02% annualized return.
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 10.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
XDEM.L
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 24.21%
- 6M
- 26.16%
- 1Y
- 34.77%
- 3Y*
- 25.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- 16.02%
XDWH.DE vs. XDEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -0.42% | 2.20% | 7.45% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 30.30% | 2.70% | 27.21% | 5.98% | 5.52% |
XDEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 24.21% | 6.65% | 39.28% | 8.13% | -12.80% | 23.13% | 17.40% | 31.22% | 1.02% | 15.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWH.DE and XDEM.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2014 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XDWH.DE and XDEM.L has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWH.DE vs. XDEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWH.DE
XDEM.L
XDWH.DE vs. XDEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDWH.DE | XDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 3.78 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.61 | 14.71 | -12.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDWH.DE vs. XDEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWH.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, smaller than the maximum XDEM.L drawdown of -49.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWH.DE and XDEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWH.DE | XDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.65% | -49.06% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -9.15% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.11% | -22.76% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.11% | -22.76% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.06% | -30.16% | +4.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -0.15% | -6.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -15.47% | +8.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 2.36% | +1.43% |
Volatility
XDWH.DE vs. XDEM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) is 4.75%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that XDWH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWH.DE | XDEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 6.90% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 14.99% | -5.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.76% | 17.45% | -3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 22.19% | -8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 22.80% | -7.20% |
XDWH.DE vs. XDEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDWH.DE and XDEM.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWH.DE vs. XDEM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWH.DE nor XDEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWH.DE and XDEM.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE and XDEM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XDWH.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XDEM.L is Momentum. XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and DWS.
Find the right allocation for XDWH.DE and XDEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer