PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


BND 20.00%VTI 48.00%VEA 24.00%VNQ 8.00%BondBondEquityEquityReal EstateReal Estate

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 24, 2026, the Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio returned 8.56% Year-To-Date and 10.82% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-1.44%-1.45%7.60%6.59%22.24%19.20%11.54%13.71%
Portfolio
Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio
-1.33%-0.19%8.56%8.04%20.65%16.42%8.43%10.82%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.11%0.64%0.49%0.57%4.23%3.96%0.05%1.56%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
-3.07%0.11%13.11%12.98%30.28%19.47%9.50%10.72%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
1.31%1.13%11.77%12.16%11.59%11.30%2.83%5.44%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
-1.39%-0.84%8.82%7.71%24.22%20.62%11.90%15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 26, 2007, Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.71%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 8.2 years.

Historically, 64% of months were positive and 36% were negative. The best month was Apr 2009 with a return of +10.8%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -16.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 15 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +10.9%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -9.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20262.44%2.01%-5.39%7.52%3.61%-1.44%8.56%
20252.77%0.36%-2.94%0.48%4.19%3.69%0.72%2.69%2.49%1.41%0.67%0.52%18.22%
2024-0.16%3.11%2.80%-4.02%4.10%1.41%2.74%2.45%1.76%-2.35%3.92%-3.30%12.70%
20236.98%-3.00%2.30%1.29%-1.24%4.72%2.66%-2.29%-4.29%-2.68%8.49%5.37%18.79%
2022-4.92%-2.32%1.61%-7.12%0.07%-7.04%6.91%-4.23%-8.66%5.38%6.75%-3.92%-17.58%
2021-0.50%2.06%2.61%3.95%1.17%1.37%1.54%1.83%-3.63%4.56%-1.95%3.59%17.55%

Benchmark Metrics

Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 0.78%, beta of 0.78, and R2 of 0.95 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 26, 2007.

  • This portfolio participated in 84.37% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 81.31% of its upside - more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.

Alpha
0.78%
Beta
0.78
0.95
Upside Capture
81.31%
Downside Capture
84.37%

Expense Ratio

Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.04%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio ranks 38 for risk / return — below 38% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.95

1.78

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.72

2.44

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.46

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

10.92

+0.74


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
32
1.141.701.201.594.52
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
55
1.812.481.332.6210.06
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
26
0.851.231.151.404.37
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
59
1.902.591.342.7312.14

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio Sharpe ratio is 1.95 as of Jun 24, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.55 to 2.47, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio provided a 2.19% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.19%2.40%2.46%2.38%2.33%1.97%1.96%2.40%2.73%2.33%2.54%2.48%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.58%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.56%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio was 48.48%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 493 trading sessions.

The current Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio drawdown is 1.83%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Financial crisis2007–2009
-48.48%Mar 2009
1y 5mo1y 11mo
3y 4moOct 2007 - Feb 2011
COVID crash2020
-28.73%Mar 2020
1mo 4d5mo 4d
6mo 8dFeb 2020 - Aug 2020
Bear market2022
-24.52%Oct 2022
9mo 20d1y 4mo
2y 1moDec 2021 - Feb 2024
2011 correction2011
-16.89%Oct 2011
5mo 4d4mo 28d
10mo 2dMay 2011 - Feb 2012
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-14.37%Dec 2018
3mo 26d3mo 8d
7mo 4dAug 2018 - Apr 2019

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

AI Analysis


The gist

The portfolio is mostly a global equity portfolio with a bond sleeve and a REIT sleeve, so the real bet is on public markets broadly, with only a modest stabilizer from BND.

The numbers

  • Diversification ratio is 1.12-1.14, around the 24th-32nd percentile on the platform, which is mild diversification at best.
  • Effective number of assets is 2.99 of 4, so the weights are spread, but the correlations make the portfolio behave like fewer distinct bets.
  • The main cluster is VTI + VEA + VNQ; that is the part that explains why the portfolio’s own correlations are doing so much of the work.

The good

  • BND has near-zero to slightly negative correlation with the equity sleeves, so it is doing the classic boring thing properly.
  • The foreign equity sleeve in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) does add geographic breadth, even if it is still highly linked to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).

The bad

  • VTI and VEA correlate at 0.83, which is what happens when “global diversification” turns out to mean “more stocks, in different countries.”
  • VNQ is also tied to equities, with 0.67 correlation to VTI and 0.58 to VEA, so the REIT sleeve is not behaving like a separate asset class in the way the label suggests.
  • The portfolio’s diversification benefit is modest across every window, which means the structure has been pretty consistent, just not especially separated.

The ugly

  • In an equity selloff driven by growth, rates, or liquidity, VTI, VEA, and VNQ are likely to move together while BND does most of the offsetting, which is a thin cushion for a three-sleeve equity complex.
  • If rates rise in a way that pressures REIT valuations, VNQ can stop looking like a diversifier and start looking like just another equity exposure with a real-estate accent.

Next steps

  • Portfolios with this correlation profile are typically complemented by exposures whose returns are driven by different macro forces than stocks and REITs.
  • The data fits a portfolio that is diversified by label more than by correlation, which is not unusual and not necessarily a flaw.
  • The bond sleeve is the only clearly separate cluster, so most of the diversification benefit comes from its size rather than from many independent moving parts.
AI-generated analysis. Not investment advice. Verify key facts independently.
Was this useful?

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.99, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.14

1.14

1.13

1.12

1.12

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.12, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio has a 0.94 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.96


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. VTI has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.99, while BND has the lowest at -0.14.

BND
-0.14
VNQ
0.66
VEA
0.83
VTI
0.99

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio. VTI has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.97, while BND has the lowest at -0.04.

BND
-0.04
VNQ
0.74
VEA
0.91
VTI
0.97

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BNDVNQVEAVTI
BND1.000.04-0.07-0.13
VNQ0.041.000.580.67
VEA-0.070.581.000.83
VTI-0.130.670.831.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jul 26, 2007
Diversification Analysis

Find what Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Rick Ferri Core Four Portfolio is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification