PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in WF, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Dec 19, 2007, corresponding to the inception date of EMB

Returns By Period

As of Apr 3, 2026, the WF returned -0.59% Year-To-Date and 9.66% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
WF
0.13%-3.06%-0.59%0.85%15.88%14.08%7.15%9.66%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
0.16%-3.26%-3.13%-1.24%17.86%18.10%10.66%13.75%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
1.36%-4.43%3.06%1.04%2.95%7.33%3.14%4.85%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
-0.77%-2.79%3.65%8.84%30.37%16.09%8.76%9.49%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
-0.72%-2.55%0.11%0.38%21.72%13.41%3.75%7.73%
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
0.12%-2.20%-1.09%1.28%9.38%8.40%1.88%3.24%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.42%-1.17%0.15%-0.08%4.82%4.23%0.20%2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Dec 20, 2007, WF's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.72%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 8.1 years.

Historically, 64% of months were positive and 36% were negative. The best month was Apr 2009 with a return of +14.2%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -20.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 15 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.

On a daily basis, WF closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +11.2%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -11.0%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20262.48%1.93%-5.59%0.81%-0.59%
20252.45%0.42%-2.96%-0.27%4.20%3.93%1.02%2.76%2.81%1.22%0.55%0.14%17.29%
2024-0.96%3.42%2.75%-3.88%4.02%1.72%2.98%2.58%2.72%-2.21%3.78%-3.55%13.69%
20237.46%-3.71%1.92%0.86%-1.43%5.29%3.21%-2.83%-4.54%-2.79%9.03%5.65%18.36%
2022-4.96%-3.10%1.76%-7.30%-0.39%-7.20%6.66%-3.90%-9.47%4.48%7.79%-4.14%-19.55%
2021-0.14%1.98%2.55%4.33%1.08%1.78%0.94%2.10%-4.03%4.65%-2.07%4.10%18.29%

Benchmark Metrics

WF has an annualized alpha of 0.17%, beta of 0.88, and R² of 0.94 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since December 20, 2007.

  • This portfolio participated in 91.78% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 88.30% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • With beta of 0.88 and R² of 0.94, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
0.17%
Beta
0.88
0.94
Upside Capture
88.30%
Downside Capture
91.78%

Expense Ratio

WF has an expense ratio of 0.09%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

WF ranks 35 for risk / return — below 35% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


WF Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
WF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
WF Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
WF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
WF Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

0.88

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

1.37

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.39

+0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.09

6.43

+0.65


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
540.941.471.221.537.16
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
160.180.361.050.291.11
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
831.732.361.352.6410.14
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
621.221.741.251.786.68
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
711.351.911.282.078.24
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
370.731.031.141.504.10

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

WF Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.09
  • 5-Year: 0.51
  • 10-Year: 0.64
  • All Time: 0.43

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.67, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of WF compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

WF provided a 2.56% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.56%2.58%2.75%2.75%2.88%2.15%2.25%2.71%3.16%2.65%2.94%2.91%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.16%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.86%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.90%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.70%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.15%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.54%4.48%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the WF. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the WF was 51.08%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 420 trading sessions.

The current WF drawdown is 5.26%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-51.08%May 20, 2008202Mar 9, 2009420Nov 4, 2010622
-32.74%Feb 18, 202025Mar 23, 2020111Aug 28, 2020136
-26.59%Jan 4, 2022197Oct 14, 2022364Mar 28, 2024561
-19.08%May 2, 2011108Oct 3, 201199Feb 24, 2012207
-15.35%Apr 27, 2015202Feb 11, 2016102Jul 8, 2016304

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.74, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkLQDEMBVNQVWOVEAVTIPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.070.380.660.740.830.990.95
LQD0.071.000.480.190.080.120.080.17
EMB0.380.481.000.360.420.440.390.49
VNQ0.660.190.361.000.510.580.670.77
VWO0.740.080.420.511.000.810.740.83
VEA0.830.120.440.580.811.000.830.89
VTI0.990.080.390.670.740.831.000.96
Portfolio0.950.170.490.770.830.890.961.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Dec 20, 2007