PortfoliosLab logo
David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


Performance

Performance Chart


Loading data...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jul 26, 2007, corresponding to the inception date of VEA

Returns By Period

As of May 18, 2025, the David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio returned 4.20% Year-To-Date and 6.47% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


YTD1M6M1Y5Y*10Y*
^GSPC
S&P 500
1.30%12.79%1.49%12.35%15.12%10.89%
David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio4.20%6.17%2.78%8.88%7.54%6.47%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
2.41%3.98%-1.80%10.78%8.47%5.32%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
10.62%10.35%9.53%8.17%6.64%3.05%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.21%-1.04%-2.13%-1.62%-9.55%-0.61%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.31%13.07%1.46%13.04%16.29%12.19%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
3.34%0.35%2.81%5.19%1.36%2.37%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.50%7.39%13.34%10.07%11.86%5.73%
*Annualized

Monthly Returns

The table below presents the monthly returns of David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio, with color gradation from worst to best to easily spot seasonal factors. Returns are adjusted for dividends.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20252.29%1.73%-2.25%-0.30%2.74%4.20%
2024-1.35%2.13%2.31%-4.64%3.82%1.57%3.46%2.64%2.24%-2.91%3.21%-4.40%7.82%
20237.42%-3.75%2.09%0.80%-1.98%4.04%1.90%-2.78%-5.07%-3.12%8.83%6.21%14.28%
2022-4.98%-2.15%0.96%-6.62%-1.25%-6.25%6.30%-4.36%-9.62%3.27%6.78%-3.85%-20.94%
2021-0.55%0.95%1.81%4.19%1.06%1.95%2.12%1.48%-3.74%4.49%-1.23%3.55%16.99%
20200.93%-3.89%-9.78%7.77%2.87%2.24%4.28%2.56%-1.94%-2.25%8.51%3.25%13.93%
20196.84%1.29%2.51%1.43%-1.88%3.82%0.41%1.66%0.84%1.38%1.07%1.54%22.76%
20181.22%-4.32%0.62%0.01%1.56%0.81%1.34%1.39%-0.95%-5.19%2.21%-4.35%-5.87%
20171.65%2.35%0.10%1.09%1.10%0.86%1.51%0.77%0.63%0.90%1.68%1.18%14.68%
2016-2.39%0.14%5.97%0.01%0.76%2.75%3.35%-0.79%-0.04%-2.94%-0.93%1.86%7.66%
20152.58%0.80%-0.17%-0.48%-0.40%-2.75%2.32%-4.85%-0.68%4.87%-0.33%-0.98%-0.40%
2014-0.07%3.63%0.42%1.46%2.27%1.30%-0.78%2.84%-3.55%3.38%1.55%0.04%12.98%

Expense Ratio

David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.13%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

The current rank of David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio is 50, indicating average performance compared to other portfolios on our website. Here’s a breakdown of how it compares using common performance measures.


The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance Indicators

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for positions. Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Portfolio components
Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
0.601.021.130.512.16
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
0.450.881.110.371.64
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.16-0.001.00-0.02-0.13
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
0.661.121.170.742.80
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
1.091.591.200.543.44
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
0.611.011.140.812.46

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio Sharpe ratios as of May 18, 2025 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.72
  • 5-Year: 0.64
  • 10-Year: 0.53
  • All Time: 0.47

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.57 to 1.05, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and returnβ€”likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time. For deeper analysis or to customize the calculation, use the Sharpe ratio tool.


Loading data...

Dividends

Dividend yield

David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio provided a 2.82% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Portfolio2.82%2.80%2.74%3.29%2.32%1.99%2.41%2.97%2.54%2.70%2.38%2.56%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
4.02%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%3.60%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.20%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%2.23%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.39%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%2.67%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.28%1.27%1.44%1.67%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%1.76%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
2.91%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%1.67%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.86%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%3.68%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading data...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio was 43.81%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 399 trading sessions.

The current David Swensen Yale Endowment Portfolio drawdown is 0.46%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-43.81%Nov 1, 2007339Mar 9, 2009399Oct 6, 2010738
-26.64%Dec 31, 2021199Oct 14, 2022479Sep 12, 2024678
-24.3%Feb 18, 202022Mar 18, 202096Aug 4, 2020118
-11.54%Aug 30, 201880Dec 24, 201855Mar 15, 2019135
-11.47%Jul 25, 201111Aug 8, 2011111Jan 17, 2012122

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 5.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets indicates a moderate level of diversification, where some assets may have a more significant influence on overall performance.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

^GSPCTIPTLTVNQEEMVEAVTIPortfolio
^GSPC1.00-0.12-0.290.680.750.830.990.88
TIP-0.121.000.730.02-0.07-0.06-0.120.13
TLT-0.290.731.00-0.08-0.24-0.25-0.28-0.01
VNQ0.680.02-0.081.000.530.590.690.85
EEM0.75-0.07-0.240.531.000.830.750.76
VEA0.83-0.06-0.250.590.831.000.830.84
VTI0.99-0.12-0.280.690.750.831.000.89
Portfolio0.880.13-0.010.850.760.840.891.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jul 27, 2007

AI Insight on Diversification


The portfolio is moderately diversified with a mix of asset classes that exhibit varying degrees of correlation. The correlation matrix reveals that certain positions, such as VNQ (real estate) and VEA (developed international equities), have high positive correlations with the portfolio (0.85 and 0.84 respectively), indicating these assets have a strong influence on the portfolio’s overall behavior. Similarly, VTI (total U.S. stock market) also shows a high correlation with the portfolio at 0.89, suggesting that U.S. equities play a dominant role in shaping portfolio returns.

On the other hand, fixed income positions like TIP (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) and TLT (long-term U.S. Treasuries) exhibit low or slightly negative correlations with the portfolio (-0.01 for TLT and 0.13 for TIP), which helps reduce overall portfolio volatility and enhances diversification. The negative correlations between TLT and equity positions (e.g., -0.24 with EEM and -0.25 with VEA) further support the role of bonds as a diversifier during equity market downturns.

Emerging markets equities (EEM) show moderate positive correlations with the portfolio (0.76) and with other equity positions, but their correlations with fixed income are negative or near zero, contributing to diversification benefits.

However, the high correlations among VNQ, VEA, and VTI (ranging from 0.59 to 0.83) suggest some concentration risk within the equity portion of the portfolio, as these assets tend to move in similar directions. This clustering reduces the diversification benefit within the equity sleeve.

In summary, the portfolio balances equity and fixed income exposures to achieve moderate diversification. Fixed income assets provide meaningful diversification through low or negative correlations with equities, while the equity holdings, although somewhat concentrated, cover different geographic and sector exposures. The portfolio is not overly concentrated but could improve diversification by reducing overlap among equity positions with high mutual correlations.

Last updated May 18, 2025