PortfoliosLab logo
Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


Performance

Performance Chart


Loading data...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jun 4, 2013, corresponding to the inception date of BNDX

Returns By Period

As of May 11, 2025, the Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio returned 2.29% Year-To-Date and 8.14% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


YTD1M6M1Y5Y*10Y*
^GSPC
S&P 500
-3.77%7.44%-5.60%8.37%14.12%10.46%
Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio2.29%7.59%0.12%9.06%11.17%8.14%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
-3.75%7.98%-5.68%9.17%15.27%11.77%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
2.21%0.98%1.19%5.53%-0.78%1.51%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.77%11.62%8.93%10.01%11.74%5.66%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
1.10%0.72%1.65%5.47%0.11%2.09%
*Annualized

Monthly Returns

The table below presents the monthly returns of Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio, with color gradation from worst to best to easily spot seasonal factors. Returns are adjusted for dividends.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20252.95%0.11%-2.90%0.97%1.23%2.29%
20240.18%3.25%2.93%-3.63%4.03%1.21%2.31%2.18%1.60%-2.31%3.77%-2.85%13.01%
20236.78%-2.72%2.68%1.43%-1.08%4.69%2.75%-2.25%-4.01%-2.57%8.19%5.03%19.57%
2022-4.56%-2.26%1.26%-7.34%0.47%-7.16%6.77%-4.21%-8.35%5.72%7.05%-3.84%-16.72%
2021-0.54%1.99%2.49%3.56%1.32%1.12%1.27%1.78%-3.47%4.29%-2.05%3.10%15.59%
2020-0.54%-5.97%-11.59%9.17%4.55%2.33%3.94%4.99%-2.37%-2.10%10.35%4.12%15.72%
20196.73%2.52%1.25%2.82%-4.50%5.53%0.18%-1.09%1.70%2.04%2.28%2.47%23.71%
20183.82%-3.59%-0.95%0.47%1.02%-0.10%2.35%1.31%0.21%-6.41%1.28%-5.85%-6.78%
20172.01%2.30%0.95%1.34%1.68%0.65%1.87%0.25%1.89%1.65%1.78%1.18%18.99%
2016-4.26%-0.71%5.77%1.07%0.81%-0.08%3.37%0.19%0.61%-2.02%1.35%1.81%7.82%
2015-0.70%4.47%-0.84%1.36%0.53%-1.95%1.49%-5.29%-2.45%6.03%0.03%-1.75%0.42%
2014-2.84%4.27%0.14%0.65%1.78%1.67%-1.73%2.39%-2.37%1.40%1.42%-1.05%5.63%

Expense Ratio

Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.04%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

The current rank of Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio is 58, indicating average performance compared to other portfolios on our website. Here’s a breakdown of how it compares using common performance measures.


The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance Indicators

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for positions. Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Portfolio components
Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
0.470.831.120.511.94
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
1.001.451.170.422.54
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
0.591.001.130.802.42
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
1.401.971.240.576.11

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio Sharpe ratios as of May 11, 2025 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.63
  • 5-Year: 0.80
  • 10-Year: 0.58
  • All Time: 0.64

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.41 to 0.94, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time. For deeper analysis or to customize the calculation, use the Sharpe ratio tool.


Loading data...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio provided a 2.32% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Portfolio2.32%2.40%2.35%2.17%2.04%1.71%2.38%2.60%2.18%2.35%2.33%2.48%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.35%1.27%1.44%1.67%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%1.76%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.75%3.67%3.09%2.60%1.97%2.22%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%2.79%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.91%3.36%3.16%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%3.68%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.29%4.18%4.42%1.52%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%1.54%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading data...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio was 28.24%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 99 trading sessions.

The current Bogleheads Four-fund Portfolio drawdown is 2.48%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-28.24%Feb 13, 202027Mar 23, 202099Aug 12, 2020126
-24.38%Nov 9, 2021233Oct 12, 2022327Feb 1, 2024560
-15.13%Jan 29, 2018229Dec 24, 201875Apr 12, 2019304
-13.8%May 22, 2015183Feb 11, 2016117Jul 29, 2016300
-13.02%Feb 19, 202535Apr 8, 2025

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.74, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

^GSPCBNDXBNDVEAVTIPortfolio
^GSPC1.00-0.01-0.030.810.990.96
BNDX-0.011.000.720.01-0.010.05
BND-0.030.721.000.02-0.030.05
VEA0.810.010.021.000.810.92
VTI0.99-0.01-0.030.811.000.97
Portfolio0.960.050.050.920.971.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jun 5, 2013

AI Insight on Diversification


The portfolio is moderately diversified with a mix of asset classes that exhibit varying degrees of correlation. The correlation matrix reveals that the two bond funds, BNDX (international bonds) and BND (U.S. bonds), have a relatively high correlation of 0.72, indicating some overlap in their bond exposure which may slightly reduce diversification benefits within the fixed income portion. In contrast, VEA (developed international equities) and VTI (U.S. equities) show a strong positive correlation of 0.81, reflecting their shared equity market exposure, which is expected but suggests these two equity positions move closely together.

Notably, the bond funds (BNDX and BND) have near-zero or slightly negative correlations with the equity funds (VEA and VTI), with values close to zero or slightly below, which is beneficial for diversification as bonds and equities often behave differently in various market environments. This low correlation between bonds and equities helps reduce overall portfolio volatility.

Examining the portfolio’s correlation with individual positions, VTI has the highest correlation at 0.97, indicating it is the dominant driver of the portfolio’s returns and risk profile. VEA also has a high correlation with the portfolio at 0.92, reinforcing the significant influence of equity holdings. The bond funds have much lower correlations with the portfolio (around 0.05), suggesting they contribute more to risk reduction than to return dominance.

Overall, the portfolio is well diversified across asset classes, balancing equity and bond exposures. However, the relatively high correlation between the two equity funds and between the two bond funds indicates some concentration within asset classes. The dominance of VTI in the portfolio’s behavior suggests a tilt toward U.S. equities, which could impact diversification if market conditions heavily affect that segment. Still, the inclusion of international bonds and equities provides meaningful diversification benefits, making the portfolio broadly diversified but with some room to improve within asset class diversification.

Last updated May 11, 2025