PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jul 26, 2007, corresponding to the inception date of VEA

Returns By Period

As of Apr 4, 2026, the Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio returned -0.38% Year-To-Date and 10.28% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-4.18%-3.84%-1.98%21.98%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio
-0.11%-3.32%-0.38%1.91%22.50%14.70%8.19%10.28%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
0.16%-3.97%-3.13%-1.30%24.10%18.10%10.66%13.75%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.22%-0.91%0.31%0.97%3.73%3.53%0.30%1.70%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
-0.77%-3.90%3.65%7.84%33.16%16.09%8.76%9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 27, 2007, Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio's average daily return is +0.03%, while the average monthly return is +0.67%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 8.7 years.

Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +10.4%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -15.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 15 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.

On a daily basis, Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 13, 2008 with a return of +11.6%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -9.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20262.63%1.94%-5.52%0.78%-0.38%
20252.97%0.17%-2.83%0.90%4.53%3.93%0.68%2.72%2.71%1.76%0.54%0.89%20.43%
20240.20%3.21%2.92%-3.68%4.11%1.22%2.32%2.23%1.60%-2.40%3.75%-2.90%12.88%
20236.83%-2.78%2.68%1.44%-1.14%4.67%2.75%-2.29%-4.04%-2.64%8.25%5.04%19.39%
2022-4.60%-2.26%1.23%-7.39%0.55%-7.16%6.73%-4.17%-8.41%5.63%7.12%-3.75%-16.74%
2021-0.55%1.99%2.43%3.61%1.32%1.14%1.26%1.79%-3.46%4.31%-2.09%3.14%15.63%

Benchmark Metrics

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 0.81%, beta of 0.77, and R² of 0.95 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 27, 2007.

  • This portfolio participated in 84.65% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 81.50% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.

Alpha
0.81%
Beta
0.77
0.95
Upside Capture
81.50%
Downside Capture
84.65%

Expense Ratio

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio ranks 59 for risk / return — on par with similar portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

0.88

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

1.37

+0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.39

+0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.93

6.43

+2.50


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
520.941.471.221.537.16
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
471.001.421.181.714.64
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
811.732.361.352.6410.14

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio Sharpe ratios as of Apr 4, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.32
  • 5-Year: 0.62
  • 10-Year: 0.74
  • All Time: 0.47

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.99 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio provided a 2.24% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.24%2.30%2.37%2.28%2.23%1.98%1.80%2.34%2.59%2.19%2.38%2.38%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.16%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.92%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.90%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio was 47.73%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 539 trading sessions.

The current Bogleheads Three-fund Portfolio drawdown is 5.14%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-47.73%Nov 1, 2007339Mar 9, 2009539Apr 27, 2011878
-28.12%Feb 13, 202027Mar 23, 202095Aug 6, 2020122
-24.44%Nov 9, 2021235Oct 14, 2022329Feb 7, 2024564
-17.25%May 2, 2011108Oct 3, 2011111Mar 13, 2012219
-15.25%Jan 29, 2018229Dec 24, 201881Apr 23, 2019310

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.63, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkBNDVEAVTIPortfolio
Benchmark1.00-0.140.830.990.96
BND-0.141.00-0.08-0.14-0.06
VEA0.83-0.081.000.830.94
VTI0.99-0.140.831.000.97
Portfolio0.96-0.060.940.971.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jul 27, 2007

AI Insight on Diversification


The portfolio is moderately diversified with a mix of bond and equity positions that exhibit varying degrees of correlation. The bond position (BND) has a very low or slightly negative correlation with the equity positions (VEA and VTI), which supports diversification by reducing overall portfolio volatility. Specifically, BND's correlations with VEA (-0.08) and VTI (-0.14) indicate that bonds move somewhat independently or inversely relative to these equity holdings, enhancing risk reduction.

Among the equity positions, VEA (an international equity fund) and VTI (a total U.S. equity market fund) are highly correlated at 0.83, which suggests that these two equity components tend to move in tandem. This high correlation somewhat limits diversification benefits within the equity portion of the portfolio, as these positions are likely to respond similarly to market events.

Looking at the portfolio's correlation with individual positions, the portfolio correlates very strongly with VTI (0.97) and VEA (0.94), but only weakly with BND (-0.06). This implies that the portfolio's overall performance is heavily influenced by the equity holdings, particularly VTI, which likely represents the largest allocation or dominant driver of returns and risk. The bond position, while important for diversification, has a minimal direct correlation with the portfolio's total returns, reflecting its role as a stabilizer rather than a performance driver.

In summary, the portfolio benefits from the inclusion of bonds to reduce risk, but the high correlation between the two equity funds indicates a concentration within the equity segment. The dominance of VTI in the portfolio's behavior suggests it is not fully balanced across asset classes. Overall, the portfolio is moderately diversified but leans toward equity concentration, particularly in U.S. equities, which could expose it to market-specific risks.

Last updated Apr 4, 2026
Do you find this insight useful?