PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWE.TO vs. FCID.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZWE.TO vs. FCID.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWE.TO) and Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWE.TO achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than FCID.TO's 10.23% return.


ZWE.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.89%
YTD
3.89%
6M
5.73%
1Y
12.64%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
8.22%

FCID.TO

1D
-0.41%
1M
3.45%
YTD
10.23%
6M
11.17%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWE.TO vs. FCID.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ZWE.TO
BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF
3.89%14.25%7.16%14.84%0.29%19.26%-8.67%22.06%-11.40%
FCID.TO
Fidelity International High Dividend ETF
10.23%30.48%9.16%15.21%4.07%14.85%-12.90%5.84%-2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWE.TO and FCID.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2018

0.52

The correlation between ZWE.TO and FCID.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (5 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZWE.TO vs. FCID.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZWE.TO
FCID.TO

Financial Services

22.4%
31.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
13.3%

Healthcare

10.8%
3.7%

Industrials

10.6%
13.2%

Energy

10.3%
14.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
0.2%

Basic Materials

8.5%
12.9%

Technology

6.2%
1.6%

Communication Services

5.8%

-

Utilities

5.7%

-

Real Estate

-

9.3%

Financial Services

ZWE.TO
22.4%
FCID.TO
31.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ZWE.TO
10.9%
FCID.TO
13.3%

Healthcare

ZWE.TO
10.8%
FCID.TO
3.7%

Industrials

ZWE.TO
10.6%
FCID.TO
13.2%

Energy

ZWE.TO
10.3%
FCID.TO
14.0%

Consumer Defensive

ZWE.TO
8.8%
FCID.TO
0.2%

Basic Materials

ZWE.TO
8.5%
FCID.TO
12.9%

Technology

ZWE.TO
6.2%
FCID.TO
1.6%

Communication Services

ZWE.TO
5.8%
FCID.TO

-

Utilities

ZWE.TO
5.7%
FCID.TO

-

Real Estate

ZWE.TO

-

FCID.TO
9.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZWE.TO vs. FCID.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWE.TO
ZWE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ZWE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FCID.TO
FCID.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FCID.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCID.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCID.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FCID.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCID.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWE.TO vs. FCID.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWE.TO) and Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWE.TOFCID.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

3.08

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.81

12.10

-7.28

ZWE.TO vs. FCID.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FCID.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWE.TO and FCID.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZWE.TOFCID.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.15

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

1.05

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.54

-0.05

Drawdowns

ZWE.TO vs. FCID.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWE.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.38%, roughly equal to the maximum FCID.TO drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWE.TO and FCID.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWE.TOFCID.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.38%

-34.49%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-8.78%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.60%

-15.86%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.60%

-19.68%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-1.81%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-5.68%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.23%

+0.40%

Volatility

ZWE.TO vs. FCID.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWE.TO) is 2.98%, while Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FCID.TO) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that ZWE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCID.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZWE.TOFCID.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

3.93%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

10.44%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

12.65%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.55%

13.13%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.40%

16.74%

-1.34%

ZWE.TO vs. FCID.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWE.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FCID.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZWE.TO vs. FCID.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, more than FCID.TO's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCID.TO
Fidelity International High Dividend ETF
3.39%3.61%4.16%4.49%5.08%3.30%3.78%3.82%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZWE.TO
BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF
6.74%6.81%7.25%7.25%6.98%6.30%7.74%6.53%7.59%6.49%6.76%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZWE.TO and FCID.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FCID.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FCID.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZWE.TO.

ZWE.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FCID.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWE.TO and 0.45% for FCID.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWE.TO and FCID.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer