PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZVRA vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZVRA vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVRA achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ZVRA has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of -17.62%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 32.12% annualized return.


ZVRA

1D
-1.35%
1M
-31.14%
6M
5.67%
YTD
6.14%
1Y
-14.40%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
-1.18%
10Y*
-17.62%
ALL TIME*
-23.23%

LLY

1D
-0.53%
1M
-3.60%
6M
11.14%
YTD
7.26%
1Y
56.33%
3Y*
37.33%
5Y*
37.67%
10Y*
32.12%
ALL TIME*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.62B$2.84B$3.35B
$18.33M$18.68M$21.76M

ZVRA vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZVRA
Zevra Therapeutics Inc.
6.14%7.43%27.33%42.70%-47.30%-22.23%84.70%-78.71%-56.05%37.29%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
7.26%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVRA and LLY is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZVRA:

$562.18M

LLY:

$1.08T

EPS

ZVRA:

$2.15

LLY:

$28.16

PE Ratio

ZVRA:

4.43

LLY:

40.80

PS Ratio

ZVRA:

4.50

LLY:

14.27

PB Ratio

ZVRA:

2.78

LLY:

32.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZVRA:

$122.29M

LLY:

$72.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZVRA:

$104.94M

LLY:

$59.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZVRA:

$149.15M

LLY:

$32.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZVRA vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZVRA
ZVRA Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ZVRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVRA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVRA Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZVRA vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZVRALLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.28

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

2.44

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

6.60

-7.25

ZVRA vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVRA and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZVRA vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVRA drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVRA and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZVRALLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.27%

-68.24%

-31.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.40%

-23.18%

-17.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.47%

-34.48%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.97%

-34.48%

-26.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.85%

-34.48%

-63.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.48%

-7.02%

-90.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.53%

-19.17%

-67.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.22%

8.56%

+13.66%

Volatility

ZVRA vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

Zevra Therapeutics Inc. (ZVRA) has a higher volatility of 29.44% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 8.88%. This indicates that ZVRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZVRALLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.44%

8.88%

+20.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.17%

27.69%

+21.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.35%

38.37%

+26.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.11%

32.64%

+28.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.05%

30.37%

+50.68%

Dividends

ZVRA vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

ZVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.56%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%
ZVRA
Zevra Therapeutics Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ZVRA vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zevra Therapeutics Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ZVRA and LLY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZVRA has higher volatility (29.44%) compared to LLY (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZVRA dropped -99.27% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZVRA and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer