PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZVNBX vs. TVRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZVNBX vs. TVRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) and Guggenheim Directional Allocation Fund (TVRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVNBX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than TVRIX's 9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ZVNBX has outperformed TVRIX with an annualized return of 16.57%, while TVRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.07% annualized return.


ZVNBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.96%
6M
0.27%
YTD
-0.07%
1Y
-1.27%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
16.57%

TVRIX

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.59%
6M
9.61%
YTD
9.73%
1Y
18.76%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZVNBX vs. TVRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZVNBX
Zevenbergen Growth Fund
-0.07%9.93%34.10%63.92%-54.79%-9.19%123.87%37.73%5.88%33.71%
TVRIX
Guggenheim Directional Allocation Fund
9.73%13.83%7.87%11.00%-17.53%27.30%5.08%30.45%-7.53%23.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVNBX and TVRIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2015

0.70

The correlation between ZVNBX and TVRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZVNBX vs. TVRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZVNBX
ZVNBX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ZVNBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVNBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVNBX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVNBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVNBX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TVRIX
TVRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TVRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TVRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TVRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TVRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TVRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZVNBX vs. TVRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) and Guggenheim Directional Allocation Fund (TVRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZVNBXTVRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.31

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

2.33

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.32

10.04

-9.72

ZVNBX vs. TVRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVNBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the TVRIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVNBX and TVRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZVNBX vs. TVRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVNBX drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, which is greater than TVRIX's maximum drawdown of -39.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVNBX and TVRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZVNBXTVRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.30%

-39.36%

-26.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.79%

-8.45%

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.14%

-24.87%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.28%

-24.87%

-38.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.30%

-39.36%

-26.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.70%

-2.12%

-13.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.80%

-6.03%

-13.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.56%

1.96%

+8.60%

Volatility

ZVNBX vs. TVRIX - Volatility Comparison

Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Guggenheim Directional Allocation Fund (TVRIX) at 5.59%. This indicates that ZVNBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TVRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZVNBXTVRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

5.59%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.12%

9.41%

+9.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.04%

11.31%

+12.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.57%

14.59%

+20.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.43%

17.80%

+14.63%

ZVNBX vs. TVRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVNBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TVRIX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZVNBX vs. TVRIX - Dividend Comparison

ZVNBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than TVRIX's 8.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TVRIX
Guggenheim Directional Allocation Fund
8.78%9.64%0.00%2.03%0.71%14.34%0.30%16.62%14.33%
ZVNBX
Zevenbergen Growth Fund
1.27%1.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.95%0.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZVNBX and TVRIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZVNBX has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to TVRIX (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZVNBX dropped -66.30% vs TVRIX's -39.36%.

TVRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZVNBX and TVRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer