ZVNBX vs. BPTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX).
ZVNBX is managed by Zevenbergen Capital Investments. It was launched on Aug 31, 2015. BPTRX is managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc.. It was launched on Apr 30, 2003.
Performance
ZVNBX vs. BPTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZVNBX vs. BPTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund | -15.05% | 9.93% | 34.10% | 63.92% | -54.79% | -9.19% | 123.87% | 37.73% | 5.88% | 33.71% |
BPTRX Baron Partners Fund | -5.00% | 24.54% | 32.75% | 43.09% | -42.53% | 31.35% | 148.81% | 44.99% | -2.01% | 31.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZVNBX achieves a -15.05% return, which is significantly lower than BPTRX's -5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ZVNBX has underperformed BPTRX with an annualized return of 14.42%, while BPTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.71% annualized return.
ZVNBX
- 1D
- 4.84%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -15.05%
- 6M
- -17.30%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- -2.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.42%
BPTRX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- -5.00%
- 6M
- 14.10%
- 1Y
- 38.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 23.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZVNBX vs. BPTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZVNBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BPTRX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZVNBX vs. BPTRX — Risk / Return Rank
ZVNBX
BPTRX
ZVNBX vs. BPTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZVNBX | BPTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | 1.26 | -0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.69 | 2.34 | -1.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.30 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 2.93 | -2.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 10.54 | -9.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZVNBX | BPTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.26 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.33 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.73 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.55 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZVNBX and BPTRX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZVNBX vs. BPTRX - Dividend Comparison
ZVNBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than BPTRX's 3.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund | 1.49% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.95% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BPTRX Baron Partners Fund | 3.54% | 3.36% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 3.19% | 7.72% | 3.67% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.35% |
Drawdowns
ZVNBX vs. BPTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZVNBX drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, roughly equal to the maximum BPTRX drawdown of -64.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVNBX and BPTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZVNBX | BPTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.30% | -64.11% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.79% | -10.90% | -15.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.28% | -49.87% | -13.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.30% | -51.26% | -15.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.33% | -8.27% | -20.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.85% | -13.82% | -6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.85% | 4.11% | +4.74% |
Volatility
ZVNBX vs. BPTRX - Volatility Comparison
Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) at 4.83%. This indicates that ZVNBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZVNBX | BPTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 4.83% | +4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | 22.21% | -3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.75% | 33.35% | -3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.78% | 33.89% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.31% | 32.72% | -0.41% |