PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTWO vs. JPLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZTWO vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZTWO vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTWO achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than JPLD's 0.38% return.


ZTWO

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
0.26%
6M
1.36%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JPLD

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
0.38%
6M
1.58%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZTWO vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ZTWO vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTWO
ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLD
JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTWO vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZTWOJPLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.77

2.63

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.33

4.05

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.55

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

4.03

+0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.51

19.92

+0.59

ZTWO vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTWO and JPLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZTWOJPLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

2.63

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.23

3.28

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between ZTWO and JPLD is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZTWO vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

ZTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than JPLD's 4.22% yield.


Drawdowns

ZTWO vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTWO drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum JPLD drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTWO and JPLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTWOJPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-1.17%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.93%

-1.17%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.74%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-0.14%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.24%

-0.04%

Volatility

ZTWO vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) at 0.54%. This indicates that ZTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZTWOJPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

0.54%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.89%

0.99%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54%

1.79%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.50%

1.86%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.50%

1.86%

-0.36%