PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTRE vs. ZHOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTRE vs. ZHOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZTRE having a 0.80% return and ZHOG slightly higher at 0.84%.


ZTRE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.06%
6M
0.41%
YTD
0.80%
1Y
3.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.76%

ZHOG

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.29%
6M
0.45%
YTD
0.84%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$58.62K$55.64K$69.45K
$361.74K$257.68K$173.89K

ZTRE vs. ZHOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZTRE
F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.80%6.60%0.32%
ZHOG
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
0.84%5.98%0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTRE and ZHOG is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.76

The correlation between ZTRE and ZHOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTRE vs. ZHOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZTRE
ZTRE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ZHOG
ZHOG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ZHOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZTRE vs. ZHOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTREZHOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.01

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.68

12.31

-2.62

ZTRE vs. ZHOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the ZHOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTRE and ZHOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTRE vs. ZHOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTRE drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum ZHOG drawdown of -3.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTRE and ZHOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTREZHOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-3.66%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-1.31%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.54%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.67%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.32%

+0.05%

Volatility

ZTRE vs. ZHOG - Volatility Comparison

F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG) have volatilities of 0.65% and 0.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTREZHOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.66%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

1.29%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

1.62%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.10%

3.93%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.10%

3.93%

-1.83%

ZTRE vs. ZHOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZHOG's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTRE vs. ZHOG - Dividend Comparison

ZTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, less than ZHOG's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ZHOG
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
5.04%5.35%5.50%1.70%
ZTRE
F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.23%4.37%0.39%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTRE and ZHOG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZHOG has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to ZTRE (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTRE dropped -1.45% vs ZHOG's -3.66%.

On 1-year performance, ZHOG leads with 3.61% vs 3.03% for ZTRE. On fees, ZTRE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZHOG has performed better with a 3.61% return vs 3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZTRE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for ZHOG.

ZHOG has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 4.23% for ZTRE.

ZTRE is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while ZHOG is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZTRE and 0.43% for ZHOG.

ZHOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTRE and ZHOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer