PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTRE vs. FBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTRE vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTRE achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -10.66% return.


ZTRE

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.83%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBDC

1D
-1.16%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
-10.66%
6M
-9.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTRE vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZTRE and FBDC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTRE vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTRE
ZTRE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ZTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FBDC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTRE vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTREFBDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

ZTRE vs. FBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTRE vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTRE drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum FBDC drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTRE and FBDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTREFBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-20.60%

+19.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-18.29%

+17.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-10.41%

+10.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

Volatility

ZTRE vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTREFBDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90%

18.03%

-16.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.11%

18.03%

-15.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.11%

18.03%

-15.92%

ZTRE vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTRE vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison

ZTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than FBDC's 11.67% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZTRE and FBDC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZTRE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZTRE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.67%, compared with 4.22% for ZTRE.

ZTRE is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while FBDC is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: F/m and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZTRE and 1.35% for FBDC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTRE and FBDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer