PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTR vs. CFIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTR vs. CFIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) and American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 (CFIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTR achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than CFIHX's 7.23% return.


ZTR

1D
1.04%
1M
0.81%
YTD
12.95%
6M
12.59%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
7.12%

CFIHX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
7.23%
6M
6.91%
1Y
16.95%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTR vs. CFIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZTR
Virtus Total Return Fund
12.95%18.63%18.31%-3.21%-21.32%20.57%-11.78%44.65%-24.86%31.13%
CFIHX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3
7.23%20.76%9.78%9.31%-6.86%15.39%3.52%17.60%-6.77%13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTR and CFIHX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.53

The correlation between ZTR and CFIHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTR vs. CFIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTR
ZTR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ZTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

CFIHX
CFIHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CFIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CFIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTR vs. CFIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) and American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 (CFIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTRCFIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.56

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

10.16

-2.29

ZTR vs. CFIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the CFIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTR and CFIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTR vs. CFIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTR drawdown since its inception was -57.25%, which is greater than CFIHX's maximum drawdown of -25.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTR and CFIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTRCFIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.25%

-25.26%

-31.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-6.46%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.15%

-8.88%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.64%

-17.45%

-25.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.03%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-3.41%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.63%

+1.06%

Volatility

ZTR vs. CFIHX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3 (CFIHX) at 2.49%. This indicates that ZTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTRCFIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

2.49%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

6.63%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

8.24%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

10.02%

+6.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.61%

10.96%

+10.65%

ZTR vs. CFIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTR has a 3.77% expense ratio, which is higher than CFIHX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTR vs. CFIHX - Dividend Comparison

ZTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than CFIHX's 7.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFIHX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-3
7.64%8.03%5.35%3.79%3.77%3.46%3.70%4.41%4.11%4.74%0.00%0.00%
ZTR
Virtus Total Return Fund
8.90%9.52%10.24%15.25%15.88%10.96%13.72%11.89%15.18%13.85%10.58%9.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTR and CFIHX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTR has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to CFIHX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTR dropped -57.25% vs CFIHX's -25.26%.

CFIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTR and CFIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer