ZTEN vs. BBBL
Compare and contrast key facts about F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL).
ZTEN and BBBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZTEN is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the ICE 10-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024. BBBL is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. Both ZTEN and BBBL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZTEN vs. BBBL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZTEN vs. BBBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | -0.41% | 9.15% | 0.29% |
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF | -0.52% | 7.02% | 0.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTEN achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly higher than BBBL's -0.52% return.
ZTEN
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 5.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBBL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZTEN vs. BBBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZTEN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BBBL's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ZTEN vs. BBBL — Risk / Return Rank
ZTEN
BBBL
ZTEN vs. BBBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZTEN | BBBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.38 | +0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 0.58 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.08 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 0.76 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.72 | 1.81 | +3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZTEN | BBBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.38 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.34 | +0.87 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZTEN and BBBL is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZTEN vs. BBBL - Dividend Comparison
ZTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, less than BBBL's 5.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 5.15% | 5.16% | 0.44% |
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF | 5.79% | 5.77% | 5.19% |
Drawdowns
ZTEN vs. BBBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTEN drawdown since its inception was -3.43%, smaller than the maximum BBBL drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTEN and BBBL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZTEN | BBBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.43% | -9.43% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.42% | -5.70% | +2.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -3.58% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -3.36% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 2.37% | -1.30% |
Volatility
ZTEN vs. BBBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) is 2.59%, while Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that ZTEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZTEN | BBBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 3.98% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.52% | 5.55% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.86% | 10.08% | -4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 9.96% | -4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 9.96% | -4.08% |