PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSP-U.TO vs. GARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSP-U.TO vs. GARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSP-U.TO achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 16.20% return.


ZSP-U.TO

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.54%
6M
7.86%
YTD
9.40%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
14.67%

GARP

1D
-1.26%
1M
-1.05%
6M
13.86%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
28.23%
5Y*
17.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSP-U.TO vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
9.40%17.73%24.40%26.04%-18.51%28.46%15.64%
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
16.20%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSP-U.TO and GARP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020

0.83

The correlation between ZSP-U.TO and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSP-U.TO vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSP-U.TO
ZSP-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSP-U.TO vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZSP-U.TOGARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.15

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

8.12

+1.31

ZSP-U.TO vs. GARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the GARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSP-U.TO and GARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZSP-U.TO vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSP-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSP-U.TO and GARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSP-U.TOGARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-31.34%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-13.69%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-23.73%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

-30.61%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-4.90%

+2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-7.28%

+3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

3.62%

-1.55%

Volatility

ZSP-U.TO vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) is 3.01%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that ZSP-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSP-U.TOGARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

6.18%

-3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

15.90%

-5.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

19.64%

-7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

22.30%

-5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

23.94%

-6.45%

ZSP-U.TO vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSP-U.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZSP-U.TO vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison

ZSP-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than GARP's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
0.81%0.85%1.04%1.38%1.55%1.15%1.57%1.41%1.67%1.58%1.49%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSP-U.TO and GARP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSP-U.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GARP.

ZSP-U.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while GARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. ZSP-U.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSP-U.TO and 0.15% for GARP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSP-U.TO and GARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer