ZSEP vs. FFTY

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ZSEP (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSEP is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. ZSEP is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. Over the past year, ZSEP returned 6.68% vs 38.24% for FFTY. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZSEP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.

Performance

ZSEP vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September (ZSEP) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSEP achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 22.03% return.

ZSEP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 2.65%
• 6M: 2.52%
• 1Y: 6.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFTY

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: 3.74%
• YTD: 22.03%
• 6M: 18.88%
• 1Y: 38.24%
• 3Y*: 22.24%
• 5Y*: -0.34%
• 10Y*: 8.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSEP vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZSEP Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September	2.65%	6.78%	1.42%
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	22.03%	23.38%	11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSEP and FFTY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2024	0.54

The correlation between ZSEP and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZSEP vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSEP

ZSEP Risk / Return Rank: 92
ZSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ZSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ZSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ZSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ZSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 94

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 33
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSEP vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September (ZSEP) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZSEP	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	1.07	+1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	1.49	+2.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.20	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.63	1.65	+2.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.56	4.34	+19.22

ZSEP vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSEP and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZSEP vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSEP drawdown since its inception was -3.97%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSEP and FFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZSEP	FFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.97%	-59.46%	+55.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.45%	-23.29%	+21.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-13.99%	+13.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.36%	-22.34%	+21.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	8.83%	-8.55%

Volatility

ZSEP vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September (ZSEP) is 0.50%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 13.32%. This indicates that ZSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZSEP	FFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.50%	13.32%	-12.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.84%	28.17%	-26.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38%	36.01%	-33.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.30%	29.63%	-26.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.30%	27.66%	-24.36%

ZSEP vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZSEP vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

ZSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	1.10%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%
ZSEP Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZSEP and FFTY in my portfolio?

ZSEP and FFTY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZSEP or FFTY?

FFTY has higher volatility (13.32%) compared to ZSEP (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSEP dropped -3.97% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

Which ETF is better, ZSEP or FFTY?

On 1-year performance, FFTY leads with 38.24% vs 6.68% for ZSEP. On fees, ZSEP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, ZSEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZSEP or FFTY?

Over the 1-year period, FFTY has performed better with a 38.24% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZSEP or FFTY?

ZSEP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZSEP or FFTY?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.00% for ZSEP.

What is the main difference between ZSEP and FFTY?

ZSEP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZSEP and 0.80% for FFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.