PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSCCX vs. VSCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSCCX vs. VSCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSCCX achieves a 23.02% return, which is significantly higher than VSCIX's 15.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSCCX has outperformed VSCIX with an annualized return of 12.63%, while VSCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.95% annualized return.


ZSCCX

1D
2.34%
1M
-3.40%
6M
19.37%
YTD
23.02%
1Y
39.41%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
12.63%
ALL TIME*
12.47%

VSCIX

1D
0.91%
1M
-1.56%
6M
10.36%
YTD
15.46%
1Y
26.15%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
10.95%
ALL TIME*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ZSCCX vs. VSCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZSCCX
Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund
23.02%10.25%27.77%17.94%-11.84%32.60%-1.42%21.20%-12.29%14.04%
VSCIX
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares
15.46%8.85%12.96%19.52%-17.60%17.74%19.07%27.40%-9.33%16.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSCCX and VSCIX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2011

0.92

The correlation between ZSCCX and VSCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSCCX vs. VSCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZSCCX
ZSCCX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZSCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VSCIX
VSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZSCCX vs. VSCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZSCCXVSCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

2.56

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.71

9.41

+1.30

ZSCCX vs. VSCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the VSCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSCCX and VSCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZSCCX vs. VSCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSCCX drawdown since its inception was -50.29%, smaller than the maximum VSCIX drawdown of -59.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSCCX and VSCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSCCXVSCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.29%

-59.66%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-8.97%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

-25.25%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.91%

-28.13%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.29%

-41.81%

-8.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-2.35%

-5.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-10.08%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

2.45%

+0.85%

Volatility

ZSCCX vs. VSCIX - Volatility Comparison

Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund (ZSCCX) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSCIX) at 3.31%. This indicates that ZSCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSCCXVSCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

3.31%

+3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.07%

11.97%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.93%

16.47%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.86%

20.67%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.23%

21.52%

+2.71%

ZSCCX vs. VSCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSCCX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VSCIX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZSCCX vs. VSCIX - Dividend Comparison

ZSCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VSCIX
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.22%1.34%1.31%1.55%1.55%1.25%1.15%1.40%1.68%1.36%1.50%1.49%
ZSCCX
Zacks Small-Cap Core Fund
0.00%0.00%34.48%4.49%0.49%2.30%0.02%0.10%10.82%13.57%0.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSCCX and VSCIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZSCCX has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to VSCIX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSCCX dropped -50.29% vs VSCIX's -59.66%.

ZSCCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSCCX and VSCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer