PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSC vs. JSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSC vs. JSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC) and Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSC achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly higher than JSI's 1.23% return.


ZSC

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.51%
6M
3.11%
YTD
5.92%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.35%

JSI

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.08%
6M
0.55%
YTD
1.23%
1Y
2.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.88M$5.15M$6.51M
$3.54K$12.33K$12.42K

ZSC vs. JSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZSC
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund
5.92%28.43%-14.39%3.04%
JSI
Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF
1.23%6.46%7.27%3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSC and JSI is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSC vs. JSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZSC
ZSC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ZSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

JSI
JSI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
JSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZSC vs. JSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC) and Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZSCJSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

2.11

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

6.67

+2.46

ZSC vs. JSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the JSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSC and JSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZSC vs. JSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSC drawdown since its inception was -26.49%, which is greater than JSI's maximum drawdown of -2.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSC and JSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSCJSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.49%

-2.31%

-24.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.69%

-1.68%

-6.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.87%

-0.22%

-5.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.19%

-0.34%

-13.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

0.53%

+2.56%

Volatility

ZSC vs. JSI - Volatility Comparison

USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) at 0.39%. This indicates that ZSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSCJSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

0.39%

+2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

1.66%

+7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

2.41%

+10.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.19%

2.85%

+9.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.19%

2.85%

+9.34%

ZSC vs. JSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than JSI's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZSC vs. JSI - Dividend Comparison

ZSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than JSI's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
JSI
Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF
5.93%5.80%6.16%0.84%
ZSC
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund
1.65%1.75%2.18%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSC and JSI have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZSC has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to JSI (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSC dropped -26.49% vs JSI's -2.31%.

On 1-year performance, ZSC leads with 29.04% vs 2.95% for JSI. On fees, JSI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, JSI has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZSC has performed better with a 29.04% return vs 2.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JSI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ZSC.

JSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 1.65% for ZSC.

ZSC is categorized as Commodities, while JSI is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: USCF and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ZSC and 0.50% for JSI.

ZSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSC and JSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer