ZSB vs. CPXR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ZSB (USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund) and CPXR (USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSB is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the S&P GSCI Electric Vehicle Meals Index, while CPXR is a Copper fund tracking the SummerHaven Copper Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ZSB returned 54.79% vs -0.66% for CPXR. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZSB charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for CPXR.

Performance

ZSB vs. CPXR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) and USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSB achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly lower than CPXR's 11.03% return.

ZSB

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -4.69%
• 6M: -9.42%
• YTD: 3.60%
• 1Y: 54.79%
• 3Y*: -0.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CPXR

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -8.08%
• 6M: -0.04%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 1Y: -0.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSB vs. CPXR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund	3.60%	60.56%
CPXR USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF	11.03%	35.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSB and CPXR is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025	0.52

The correlation between ZSB and CPXR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZSB vs. CPXR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSB

ZSB Risk / Return Rank: 74
ZSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ZSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
ZSB Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ZSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ZSB Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CPXR

CPXR Risk / Return Rank: 11
CPXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CPXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CPXR Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CPXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CPXR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSB vs. CPXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) and USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZSB	CPXR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	-0.01	+2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	0.46	+2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.07	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	-0.01	+3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.93	-0.03	+7.95

ZSB vs. CPXR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the CPXR Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSB and CPXR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZSB vs. CPXR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSB drawdown since its inception was -49.26%, roughly equal to the maximum CPXR drawdown of -47.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSB and CPXR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZSB	CPXR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.26%	-47.87%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.75%	-47.87%	+31.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.65%	-13.36%	+0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.33%	-19.29%	-11.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.93%	26.26%	-19.33%

Volatility

ZSB vs. CPXR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) is 5.24%, while USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) has a volatility of 14.86%. This indicates that ZSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZSB	CPXR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	14.86%	-9.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.63%	43.15%	-21.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.62%	67.56%	-40.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.57%	67.61%	-48.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	67.61%	-48.04%

ZSB vs. CPXR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSB has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CPXR's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZSB vs. CPXR - Dividend Comparison

ZSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than CPXR's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CPXR USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF	0.63%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund	0.89%	0.92%	2.96%	3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZSB and CPXR in my portfolio?

ZSB and CPXR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZSB or CPXR?

CPXR has higher volatility (14.86%) compared to ZSB (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSB dropped -49.26% vs CPXR's -47.87%.

Which ETF is better, ZSB or CPXR?

On 1-year performance, ZSB leads with 54.79% vs -0.66% for CPXR. On fees, ZSB is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ZSB has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZSB or CPXR?

Over the 1-year period, ZSB has performed better with a 54.79% return vs -0.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZSB or CPXR?

ZSB is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for CPXR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZSB or CPXR?

ZSB has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.63% for CPXR.

What is the main difference between ZSB and CPXR?

ZSB is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while CPXR is Copper. ZSB tracks S&P GSCI Electric Vehicle Meals Index, while CPXR tracks SummerHaven Copper Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ZSB and 1.20% for CPXR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.