ZSB vs. COMT
Compare and contrast key facts about USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT).
ZSB and COMT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZSB is a passively managed fund by USCF that tracks the performance of the S&P GSCI Electric Vehicle Meals Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2023. COMT is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Oct 15, 2014.
Performance
ZSB vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZSB vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund | 5.29% | 64.34% | -19.70% | -31.38% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.39% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -4.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSB achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.39% return.
ZSB
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 5.29%
- 6M
- 33.68%
- 1Y
- 52.55%
- 3Y*
- 0.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- 18.34%
- YTD
- 39.39%
- 6M
- 41.00%
- 1Y
- 40.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.33%
- 5Y*
- 16.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZSB vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSB has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZSB vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
ZSB
COMT
ZSB vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSB | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 1.99 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 2.67 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.48 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 9.87 | -1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSB | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.99 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSB and COMT is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZSB vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
ZSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than COMT's 5.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSB USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund | 0.87% | 0.92% | 2.96% | 3.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.55% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
Drawdowns
ZSB vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSB drawdown since its inception was -49.26%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSB and COMT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSB | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.26% | -51.89% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.75% | -8.01% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.23% | 0.00% | -11.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -24.37% | -7.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.41% | 4.17% | +2.24% |
Volatility
ZSB vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) has a higher volatility of 11.89% compared to iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) at 10.87%. This indicates that ZSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZSB | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.89% | 10.87% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.62% | 15.73% | +6.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.76% | 20.26% | +6.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 20.60% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 18.73% | +1.04% |