PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRS.DE vs. SPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRS.DE vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRS.DE) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZPRS.DE is traded in EUR, while SPSM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPSM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRS.DE achieves a 14.17% return, which is significantly lower than SPSM's 16.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPRS.DE has underperformed SPSM with an annualized return of 9.85%, while SPSM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.


ZPRS.DE

1D
-0.25%
1M
4.47%
YTD
14.17%
6M
16.07%
1Y
29.50%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
9.85%

SPSM

1D
-0.71%
1M
2.35%
YTD
16.66%
6M
14.82%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
11.39%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRS.DE vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPRS.DE
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
14.17%7.37%13.79%12.57%-13.88%25.10%5.40%30.21%-11.45%7.16%
SPSM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
16.66%-6.48%15.71%12.63%-10.92%36.15%2.48%28.70%-7.00%1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRS.DE and SPSM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2013

0.61

The correlation between ZPRS.DE and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRS.DE vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRS.DE
ZPRS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ZPRS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRS.DE vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRS.DE) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPRS.DESPSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

4.29

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.33

13.65

+1.69

ZPRS.DE vs. SPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the SPSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRS.DE and SPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPRS.DESPSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.69

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.32

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.45

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.47

+0.12

Drawdowns

ZPRS.DE vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRS.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SPSM drawdown of -41.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRS.DE and SPSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRS.DESPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.22%

-41.38%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-6.76%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.49%

-31.59%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-31.59%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-41.38%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.91%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-7.96%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.12%

-0.20%

Volatility

ZPRS.DE vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRS.DE) is 3.75%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that ZPRS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRS.DESPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

4.00%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

11.40%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

17.27%

-3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

21.01%

-4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

23.25%

-5.99%

ZPRS.DE vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRS.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPRS.DE vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison

ZPRS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPSM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.43%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%
ZPRS.DE
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRS.DE and SPSM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZPRS.DE.

ZPRS.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while SPSM is Small Cap Blend Equities. ZPRS.DE tracks MSCI World Small Cap, while SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZPRS.DE and 0.05% for SPSM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRS.DE and SPSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer