PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRR.DE vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRR.DE) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZPRR.DE is traded in EUR, while VB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VB values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRR.DE achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 16.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPRR.DE has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 10.37%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.02% annualized return.


ZPRR.DE

1D
0.93%
1M
4.09%
YTD
17.93%
6M
16.88%
1Y
38.46%
3Y*
15.40%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
10.37%

VB

1D
0.56%
1M
3.72%
YTD
16.26%
6M
14.64%
1Y
27.60%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
11.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPRR.DE
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF
17.93%1.37%15.82%14.82%-16.60%25.11%8.22%28.97%-8.99%0.49%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
16.26%-4.05%21.71%14.68%-12.40%26.37%9.37%30.21%-5.09%1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRR.DE and VB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014

0.64

The correlation between ZPRR.DE and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRR.DE vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRR.DE
ZPRR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ZPRR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRR.DE) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPRR.DEVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

4.09

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.24

13.01

+0.23

ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRR.DE and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPRR.DEVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.74

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.41

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.51

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.45

+0.03

Drawdowns

ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRR.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -54.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRR.DE and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRR.DEVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.20%

-54.29%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-6.77%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.54%

-28.95%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.54%

-28.95%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.20%

-41.73%

+0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-9.35%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.13%

+0.77%

Volatility

ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRR.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 3.65%. This indicates that ZPRR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRR.DEVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

3.65%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

11.24%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.20%

15.95%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

20.17%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.60%

21.59%

+0.01%

ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRR.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

ZPRR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
ZPRR.DE
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRR.DE and VB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZPRR.DE.

ZPRR.DE tracks Russell 2000®, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZPRR.DE and 0.05% for VB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRR.DE and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer