ZPRR.DE vs. VB
ZPRR.DE (SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - ZPRR.DE tracks the Russell 2000® while VB tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZPRR.DE returned 10.37%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for VB. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZPRR.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZPRR.DE is traded in EUR, while VB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VB values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPRR.DE achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 16.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPRR.DE has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 10.37%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.02% annualized return.
ZPRR.DE
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 17.93%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 38.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
VB
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 27.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPRR.DE SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 17.93% | 1.37% | 15.82% | 14.82% | -16.60% | 25.11% | 8.22% | 28.97% | -8.99% | 0.49% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 16.26% | -4.05% | 21.71% | 14.68% | -12.40% | 26.37% | 9.37% | 30.21% | -5.09% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPRR.DE and VB is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ZPRR.DE and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPRR.DE vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
ZPRR.DE
VB
ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRR.DE) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPRR.DE | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 4.09 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 13.01 | +0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPRR.DE | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.74 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.41 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.51 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.45 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPRR.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -54.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRR.DE and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPRR.DE | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -54.29% | +13.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -6.77% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.54% | -28.95% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.54% | -28.95% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.20% | -41.73% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -9.35% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.13% | +0.77% |
Volatility
ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRR.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 3.65%. This indicates that ZPRR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPRR.DE | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 3.65% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.26% | 11.24% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.20% | 15.95% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 20.17% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 21.59% | +0.01% |
ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPRR.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZPRR.DE vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
ZPRR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
ZPRR.DE SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPRR.DE and VB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZPRR.DE.
ZPRR.DE tracks Russell 2000®, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZPRR.DE and 0.05% for VB.
Find the right allocation for ZPRR.DE and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer