ZPRD.DE vs. AMED.DE
ZPRD.DE (SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - ZPRD.DE tracks the FTSE All-Share while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZPRD.DE returned 10.23%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZPRD.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
ZPRD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPRD.DE achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return.
ZPRD.DE
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 5.97%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- 1Y
- 20.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.23%
- 10Y*
- —
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
ZPRD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPRD.DE SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 5.97% | 23.92% | 8.36% | 8.17% | -0.15% | 15.48% | -8.93% | 22.45% | -7.86% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -14.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPRD.DE and AMED.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ZPRD.DE and AMED.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPRD.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPRD.DE
AMED.DE
ZPRD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (ZPRD.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPRD.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 2.49 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.88 | 9.40 | -1.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPRD.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 1.74 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.65 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.47 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
ZPRD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPRD.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, smaller than the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRD.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPRD.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.32% | -38.35% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.84% | -10.56% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -14.07% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.17% | -24.06% | +10.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -0.17% | -3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -6.69% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.81% | -0.23% |
Volatility
ZPRD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (ZPRD.DE) is 3.64%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that ZPRD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPRD.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 5.61% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.41% | 12.64% | -3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.83% | 15.19% | -4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 15.87% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 17.00% | -1.77% |
ZPRD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPRD.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZPRD.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
ZPRD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZPRD.DE SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 2.69% | 2.95% | 3.76% | 3.34% | 3.42% | 3.25% | 2.97% | 5.37% | 3.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPRD.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPRD.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPRD.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
ZPRD.DE tracks FTSE All-Share, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ZPRD.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZPRD.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer