ZPRA.DE vs. PAC.DE
ZPRA.DE (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)) and PAC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - ZPRA.DE tracks the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats while PAC.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZPRA.DE returned 5.15%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for PAC.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZPRA.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for PAC.DE.
Performance
ZPRA.DE vs. PAC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPRA.DE achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than PAC.DE's 8.00% return.
ZPRA.DE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 10.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 12.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
ZPRA.DE vs. PAC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPRA.DE SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.42% | 9.80% | 11.25% | 11.54% | -10.70% | 12.81% | -9.50% | 24.48% | -4.62% | 13.94% |
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.00% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | 0.50% | 12.85% | -2.66% | 21.45% | -6.04% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPRA.DE and PAC.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ZPRA.DE and PAC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPRA.DE vs. PAC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPRA.DE
PAC.DE
ZPRA.DE vs. PAC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPRA.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.00 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 5.65 | -0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPRA.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.08 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.43 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
ZPRA.DE vs. PAC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPRA.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.54%, smaller than the maximum PAC.DE drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRA.DE and PAC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPRA.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.54% | -36.90% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.57% | -6.33% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.55% | -20.21% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.66% | -20.21% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -2.33% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -5.10% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.25% | -0.12% |
Volatility
ZPRA.DE vs. PAC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE) is 2.71%, while BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that ZPRA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPRA.DE | PAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 3.19% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.42% | 8.91% | -1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.67% | 11.77% | -2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 14.54% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 16.52% | -2.05% |
ZPRA.DE vs. PAC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPRA.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PAC.DE's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZPRA.DE vs. PAC.DE - Dividend Comparison
ZPRA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while PAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZPRA.DE SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.98% | 2.92% | 3.64% | 4.00% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.41% | 1.78% | 2.25% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPRA.DE and PAC.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAC.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ZPRA.DE.
ZPRA.DE tracks S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats, while PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZPRA.DE and 0.16% for PAC.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZPRA.DE and PAC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer