ZPR.TO vs. ZFH.TO
ZPR.TO (BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF) and ZFH.TO (BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZPR.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index, while ZFH.TO is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by BMO. ZPR.TO is passively managed, while ZFH.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZPR.TO returned 8.11%/yr vs 5.61%/yr for ZFH.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZPR.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ZFH.TO.
Performance
ZPR.TO vs. ZFH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPR.TO achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly higher than ZFH.TO's 2.17% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPR.TO has outperformed ZFH.TO with an annualized return of 8.11%, while ZFH.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.61% annualized return.
ZPR.TO
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 7.47%
- 1Y
- 18.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.11%
ZFH.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 5.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 5.61%
ZPR.TO vs. ZFH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPR.TO BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF | 6.02% | 18.58% | 26.58% | 7.21% | -17.66% | 23.77% | 6.00% | 2.10% | -9.86% | 14.55% |
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | 2.17% | 5.53% | 11.55% | 13.55% | -0.94% | 4.73% | -3.93% | 11.12% | 0.72% | 5.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPR.TO and ZFH.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2014 | 0.17 |
ZPR.TO vs. ZFH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZPR.TO
ZFH.TO
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
ZPR.TO
ZFH.TO
-
Basic Materials
ZPR.TO
-
ZFH.TO
-
Communication Services
ZPR.TO
-
ZFH.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZPR.TO
-
ZFH.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZPR.TO
-
ZFH.TO
-
Energy
ZPR.TO
-
ZFH.TO
-
Financial Services
ZPR.TO
-
ZFH.TO
-
Healthcare
ZPR.TO
-
ZFH.TO
-
Industrials
ZPR.TO
-
ZFH.TO
-
Real Estate
ZPR.TO
-
ZFH.TO
Technology
ZPR.TO
-
ZFH.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPR.TO vs. ZFH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZPR.TO
ZFH.TO
ZPR.TO vs. ZFH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) and BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPR.TO | ZFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.95 | 1.29 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.67 | 1.84 | +5.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.38 | 6.33 | +39.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPR.TO | ZFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.38 | 1.54 | +2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 1.05 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.68 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.64 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
ZPR.TO vs. ZFH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.92%, which is greater than ZFH.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPR.TO and ZFH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPR.TO | ZFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.92% | -20.98% | -23.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.47% | -3.27% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.75% | -6.40% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.06% | -9.53% | -13.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.05% | -20.98% | -23.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.20% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -1.80% | -7.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 0.95% | -0.53% |
Volatility
ZPR.TO vs. ZFH.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) at 0.96%. This indicates that ZPR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZFH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPR.TO | ZFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 0.96% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 3.01% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 3.92% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.33% | 6.42% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.50% | 8.33% | +3.17% |
ZPR.TO vs. ZFH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPR.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ZFH.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZPR.TO vs. ZFH.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZPR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than ZFH.TO's 5.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | 5.21% | 5.52% | 7.72% | 6.98% | 4.75% | 4.48% | 4.51% | 4.27% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 4.64% | 4.94% |
ZPR.TO BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF | 5.07% | 4.86% | 4.93% | 5.92% | 5.97% | 4.66% | 5.48% | 5.24% | 4.70% | 3.94% | 4.97% | 5.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPR.TO and ZFH.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZFH.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZFH.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZPR.TO.
ZPR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while ZFH.TO is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZPR.TO and 0.40% for ZFH.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZPR.TO and ZFH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer