ZFH.TO vs. DXV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) and Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO).
ZFH.TO and DXV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZFH.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Feb 10, 2014.
Performance
ZFH.TO vs. DXV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZFH.TO vs. DXV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | -1.83% | 5.53% | 11.55% | 13.55% | -0.94% | 4.73% | -3.93% | 11.12% | 1.39% |
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 0.54% | 4.04% | 5.84% | 6.04% | 1.49% | -0.21% | 3.59% | 3.58% | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZFH.TO achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than DXV.TO's 0.54% return.
ZFH.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 8.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
DXV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZFH.TO vs. DXV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
ZFH.TO vs. DXV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZFH.TO
DXV.TO
ZFH.TO vs. DXV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) and Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZFH.TO | DXV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 2.45 | -1.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 3.78 | -2.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.51 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 7.14 | -6.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 35.41 | -31.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZFH.TO | DXV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 2.45 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 1.13 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.67 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZFH.TO and DXV.TO is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZFH.TO vs. DXV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than DXV.TO's 3.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | 5.46% | 5.52% | 7.72% | 6.98% | 4.75% | 4.48% | 4.51% | 4.27% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 4.64% | 4.94% |
DXV.TO Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 3.17% | 3.35% | 5.32% | 6.33% | 3.98% | 0.69% | 1.89% | 2.25% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZFH.TO vs. DXV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, which is greater than DXV.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFH.TO and DXV.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZFH.TO | DXV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -11.62% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.26% | -0.51% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.53% | -2.71% | -6.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | -0.11% | -3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -0.39% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 0.10% | +0.98% |
Volatility
ZFH.TO vs. DXV.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to Dynamic Active Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (DXV.TO) at 0.62%. This indicates that ZFH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZFH.TO | DXV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 0.62% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.97% | 1.19% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.80% | 1.50% | +4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.46% | 3.05% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 4.68% | +3.70% |