PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPR.TO vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPR.TO vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZPR.TO is traded in CAD, while PYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PYLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPR.TO achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 2.23% return.


ZPR.TO

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.89%
YTD
6.02%
6M
7.47%
1Y
18.85%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
8.11%

PYLD

1D
0.18%
1M
2.54%
YTD
2.23%
6M
0.92%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPR.TO vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZPR.TO
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF
6.02%18.58%26.58%6.85%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
2.23%4.55%16.94%6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPR.TO and PYLD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023

0.05

ZPR.TO vs. PYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZPR.TO
PYLD

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

ZPR.TO
100.0%
PYLD

-

Basic Materials

ZPR.TO

-

PYLD

-

Communication Services

ZPR.TO

-

PYLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

ZPR.TO

-

PYLD

-

Consumer Defensive

ZPR.TO

-

PYLD

-

Energy

ZPR.TO

-

PYLD
100.0%

Financial Services

ZPR.TO

-

PYLD

-

Healthcare

ZPR.TO

-

PYLD

-

Industrials

ZPR.TO

-

PYLD

-

Real Estate

ZPR.TO

-

PYLD

-

Technology

ZPR.TO

-

PYLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPR.TO vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPR.TO
ZPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPR.TO vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPR.TOPYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.95

1.33

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.67

2.69

+4.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.38

6.76

+38.62

ZPR.TO vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.38, which is higher than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPR.TO and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPR.TOPYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38

1.79

+2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.87

-1.52

Drawdowns

ZPR.TO vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.92%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -6.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPR.TO and PYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPR.TOPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.92%

-6.68%

-38.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-3.28%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

0.00%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-1.21%

-8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

1.30%

-0.88%

Volatility

ZPR.TO vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) is 1.14%, while PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that ZPR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPR.TOPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.36%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

3.90%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.33%

4.93%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.33%

5.46%

+2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

5.46%

+6.04%

ZPR.TO vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPR.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPR.TO vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

ZPR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than PYLD's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.30%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZPR.TO
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF
5.07%4.86%4.93%5.92%5.97%4.66%5.48%5.24%4.70%3.94%4.97%5.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPR.TO and PYLD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPR.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPR.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PYLD.

ZPR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while PYLD is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BMO and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZPR.TO and 0.55% for PYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPR.TO and PYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer