ZPH.TO vs. HUTE.TO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ZPH.TO (BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF) and HUTE.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZPH.TO returned 7.98%/yr vs 17.41%/yr for HUTE.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZPH.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HUTE.TO.

Performance

ZPH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPH.TO achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than HUTE.TO's 13.42% return.

ZPH.TO

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.47%
• 6M: 3.15%
• YTD: 2.64%
• 1Y: 8.71%
• 3Y*: 7.98%
• 5Y*: 5.84%
• 10Y*: —

HUTE.TO

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 0.73%
• 6M: 12.29%
• YTD: 13.42%
• 1Y: 19.80%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ZPH.TO BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF	2.64%	9.47%	4.21%	22.61%	2.52%
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	13.42%	19.04%	18.16%	0.10%	0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPH.TO and HUTE.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022	0.17

The correlation between ZPH.TO and HUTE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZPH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZPH.TO	HUTE.TO
Technology	42.2%	-
Financial Services	17.2%	-
Healthcare	17.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	-
Industrials	6.8%	3.3%
Communication Services	5.7%	38.2%
Consumer Cyclical	2.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	18.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	40.4%

Return for Risk

ZPH.TO vs. HUTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPH.TO

ZPH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
ZPH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ZPH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ZPH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ZPH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ZPH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 42

HUTE.TO

HUTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 62
HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
HUTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
HUTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
HUTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
HUTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZPH.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.61	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	2.29	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.29	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	2.90	-1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.44	8.27	-2.83

ZPH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPH.TO and HUTE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZPH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.38%, which is greater than HUTE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPH.TO and HUTE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZPH.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.38%	-18.35%	-15.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.07%	-6.85%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.83%	-13.25%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.59%	+3.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-3.92%	-0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	2.40%	-0.80%

Volatility

ZPH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) is 2.42%, while Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that ZPH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZPH.TO	HUTE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	5.19%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.64%	10.64%	-5.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.55%	12.34%	-5.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.18%	14.63%	-3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.59%	14.63%	-2.04%

ZPH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPH.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HUTE.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZPH.TO vs. HUTE.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZPH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.32%, more than HUTE.TO's 9.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	9.27%	9.64%	10.24%	10.72%	1.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZPH.TO BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF	10.32%	10.06%	9.95%	8.18%	8.83%	7.27%	7.67%	7.26%	6.98%	5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZPH.TO and HUTE.TO in my portfolio?

ZPH.TO and HUTE.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZPH.TO or HUTE.TO?

On fees, HUTE.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZPH.TO or HUTE.TO?

HUTE.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZPH.TO.

What is the main difference between ZPH.TO and HUTE.TO?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZPH.TO and 0.50% for HUTE.TO.