ZPH.TO vs. CRCY.TO
ZPH.TO (BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF) and CRCY.TO (Harvest Circle Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZPH.TO vs. CRCY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPH.TO achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly higher than CRCY.TO's -31.06% return.
ZPH.TO
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 7.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- —
CRCY.TO
- 1D
- -5.48%
- 1M
- -20.97%
- 6M
- -35.47%
- YTD
- -31.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZPH.TO vs. CRCY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZPH.TO BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF | 1.91% | 3.04% |
CRCY.TO Harvest Circle Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | -31.06% | -48.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPH.TO and CRCY.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPH.TO vs. CRCY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZPH.TO
CRCY.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZPH.TO vs. CRCY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) and Harvest Circle Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (CRCY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZPH.TO | CRCY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.67 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZPH.TO vs. CRCY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.38%, smaller than the maximum CRCY.TO drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPH.TO and CRCY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPH.TO | CRCY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.38% | -73.84% | +40.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -68.82% | +68.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -48.00% | +43.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | — | — |
Volatility
ZPH.TO vs. CRCY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPH.TO | CRCY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.54% | 109.77% | -103.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.18% | 109.77% | -98.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 109.77% | -97.17% |
Dividends
ZPH.TO vs. CRCY.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZPH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, less than CRCY.TO's 75.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRCY.TO Harvest Circle Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 75.36% | 17.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZPH.TO BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF | 10.40% | 10.06% | 9.95% | 8.18% | 8.83% | 7.27% | 7.67% | 7.26% | 6.98% | 5.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPH.TO and CRCY.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for ZPH.TO and CRCY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer