PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HUTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HUTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF
12.55%19.04%18.15%0.09%7.10%
HUTL.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF
11.42%15.59%14.70%3.11%5.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTE.TO achieves a 12.55% return, which is significantly higher than HUTL.TO's 11.42% return.


HUTE.TO

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
12.55%
6M
13.89%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
10Y*

HUTL.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
11.42%
6M
12.52%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HUTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTE.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HUTL.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HUTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTE.TO
HUTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HUTL.TO
HUTL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

1.43

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

1.96

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.66

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.38

11.46

-2.08

HUTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTE.TO and HUTL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.43

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.51

+0.66

Correlation

The correlation between HUTE.TO and HUTL.TO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HUTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than HUTL.TO's 7.34% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
HUTE.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF
8.09%9.64%10.24%10.70%1.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUTL.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF
7.34%7.94%8.30%8.56%8.13%7.16%7.73%5.33%

Drawdowns

HUTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.36%, smaller than the maximum HUTL.TO drawdown of -34.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTE.TO and HUTL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HUTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.36%

-34.00%

+15.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-7.22%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-0.98%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-6.80%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.67%

+0.62%

Volatility

HUTE.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) at 3.63%. This indicates that HUTE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUTL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HUTE.TOHUTL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

3.63%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

6.70%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

13.62%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

12.83%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.26%

15.29%

-1.03%