PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPDW.DE vs. EMNJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPDW.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZPDW.DE having a 20.74% return and EMNJ.DE slightly lower at 19.97%.


ZPDW.DE

1D
-0.90%
1M
0.79%
6M
13.52%
YTD
20.74%
1Y
49.79%
3Y*
27.02%
5Y*
19.99%
10Y*
14.41%

EMNJ.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.81%
6M
13.73%
YTD
19.97%
1Y
39.88%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDW.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZPDW.DE
State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF
20.74%27.50%22.78%33.59%-5.96%12.63%7.91%10.22%
EMNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
19.97%12.87%10.79%16.08%-13.34%9.71%5.81%3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDW.DE and EMNJ.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.84

The correlation between ZPDW.DE and EMNJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (5 years) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPDW.DE vs. EMNJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDW.DE
ZPDW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ZPDW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EMNJ.DE
EMNJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EMNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDW.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPDW.DEEMNJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.36

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.14

3.71

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.99

12.48

+4.50

ZPDW.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the EMNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDW.DE and EMNJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPDW.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDW.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, which is greater than EMNJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDW.DE and EMNJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPDW.DEEMNJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-28.10%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-10.70%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.70%

-16.91%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.70%

-19.91%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-2.74%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-6.57%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.19%

-0.27%

Volatility

ZPDW.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) have volatilities of 6.74% and 6.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPDW.DEEMNJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

6.67%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.39%

16.64%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.62%

20.49%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.81%

17.02%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

18.26%

+0.17%

ZPDW.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPDW.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than EMNJ.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPDW.DE vs. EMNJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

ZPDW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.42%1.58%1.80%1.75%2.16%1.66%1.63%1.72%
ZPDW.DE
State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ZPDW.DE and EMNJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EMNJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMNJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ZPDW.DE.

ZPDW.DE tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to EUR Index, while EMNJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ZPDW.DE and 0.15% for EMNJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPDW.DE and EMNJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer