PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPDI.DE vs. XDWI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPDI.DE vs. XDWI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPDI.DE achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly higher than XDWI.DE's 15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPDI.DE has outperformed XDWI.DE with an annualized return of 13.36%, while XDWI.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.99% annualized return.


ZPDI.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
4.99%
6M
15.05%
YTD
19.85%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
13.36%

XDWI.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
3.58%
6M
10.00%
YTD
15.73%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDI.DE vs. XDWI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPDI.DE
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
19.85%6.82%23.74%13.82%-0.16%32.11%-0.48%32.04%-9.77%8.34%
XDWI.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C
15.73%12.06%19.50%19.04%-7.86%26.23%1.52%31.53%-11.19%10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDI.DE and XDWI.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.93

The correlation between ZPDI.DE and XDWI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPDI.DE vs. XDWI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDI.DE
ZPDI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ZPDI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWI.DE
XDWI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XDWI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDI.DE vs. XDWI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPDI.DEXDWI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.36

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.98

8.43

+0.55

ZPDI.DE vs. XDWI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the XDWI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDI.DE and XDWI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPDI.DE vs. XDWI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDI.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum XDWI.DE drawdown of -47.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDI.DE and XDWI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPDI.DEXDWI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.62%

-47.66%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-9.28%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.54%

-19.09%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.54%

-19.09%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.62%

-38.08%

-3.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-2.51%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-9.10%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.60%

+0.11%

Volatility

ZPDI.DE vs. XDWI.DE - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDI.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.DE) at 4.88%. This indicates that ZPDI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPDI.DEXDWI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

4.88%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

12.37%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

15.17%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

15.42%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

17.57%

+2.95%

ZPDI.DE vs. XDWI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPDI.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWI.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPDI.DE vs. XDWI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZPDI.DE nor XDWI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ZPDI.DE and XDWI.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZPDI.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDI.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWI.DE.

ZPDI.DE tracks S&P Industrials Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XDWI.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDI.DE and 0.25% for XDWI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPDI.DE and XDWI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer