PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPDI.DE vs. 2B7C.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPDI.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDI.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZPDI.DE having a 19.85% return and 2B7C.DE slightly lower at 19.72%.


ZPDI.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
4.99%
6M
15.05%
YTD
19.85%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
13.36%

2B7C.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
4.98%
6M
15.02%
YTD
19.72%
1Y
25.05%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
14.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDI.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPDI.DE
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
19.85%6.82%23.74%13.82%-0.16%32.11%-0.48%32.04%-9.77%7.16%
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
19.72%6.93%23.74%13.77%-0.13%32.10%-0.53%32.25%-10.21%-2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDI.DE and 2B7C.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2017

0.99

The correlation between ZPDI.DE and 2B7C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPDI.DE vs. 2B7C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDI.DE
ZPDI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ZPDI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7C.DE
2B7C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDI.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDI.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPDI.DE2B7C.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.73

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.98

8.84

+0.14

ZPDI.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the 2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDI.DE and 2B7C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPDI.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDI.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, roughly equal to the maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown of -41.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDI.DE and 2B7C.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPDI.DE2B7C.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.62%

-41.31%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-8.89%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.54%

-22.67%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.54%

-22.67%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-2.11%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-5.80%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.75%

-0.04%

Volatility

ZPDI.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDI.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) have volatilities of 5.19% and 5.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPDI.DE2B7C.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

5.12%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

11.82%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

15.14%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

16.83%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

20.22%

+0.30%

ZPDI.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZPDI.DE and 2B7C.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPDI.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZPDI.DE nor 2B7C.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, ZPDI.DE and 2B7C.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDI.DE and 2B7C.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

ZPDI.DE tracks S&P Industrials Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while 2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPDI.DE and 2B7C.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer