ZPDE.DE vs. LOGS.DE
ZPDE.DE (SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) and LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - ZPDE.DE tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector while LOGS.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZPDE.DE returned 9.33%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for LOGS.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZPDE.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LOGS.DE.
Performance
ZPDE.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZPDE.DE having a 32.72% return and LOGS.DE slightly lower at 31.31%. Over the past 10 years, ZPDE.DE has underperformed LOGS.DE with an annualized return of 9.33%, while LOGS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.
ZPDE.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 32.72%
- 6M
- 29.61%
- 1Y
- 43.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 21.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
ZPDE.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPDE.DE SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 32.72% | -2.67% | 9.39% | -2.97% | 71.20% | 66.70% | -38.96% | 13.17% | -14.79% | -13.20% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.06% | -21.75% | 4.34% | 5.49% | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPDE.DE and LOGS.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ZPDE.DE and LOGS.DE has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPDE.DE vs. LOGS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPDE.DE
LOGS.DE
ZPDE.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDE.DE) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPDE.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.62 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 9.83 | -7.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 34.29 | -26.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPDE.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 3.73 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.98 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.51 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.24 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
ZPDE.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPDE.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than LOGS.DE's maximum drawdown of -56.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDE.DE and LOGS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPDE.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -56.42% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.16% | -6.50% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.97% | -21.16% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.97% | -21.16% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.58% | -56.42% | -9.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -4.69% | -4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.28% | -15.22% | -2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.40% | 1.87% | +3.53% |
Volatility
ZPDE.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDE.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) at 6.06%. This indicates that ZPDE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOGS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPDE.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 6.06% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | 13.34% | +7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.96% | 17.18% | +6.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 21.72% | +5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 24.09% | +4.80% |
ZPDE.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPDE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LOGS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZPDE.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPDE.DE nor LOGS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPDE.DE and LOGS.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPDE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPDE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
ZPDE.DE tracks S&P Energy Select Sector, while LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDE.DE and 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZPDE.DE and LOGS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer