ZPDE.DE vs. GLTR
ZPDE.DE (SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) and GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZPDE.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Energy Select Sector, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZPDE.DE returned 9.33%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for GLTR. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZPDE.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.
Performance
ZPDE.DE vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZPDE.DE is traded in EUR, while GLTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLTR values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPDE.DE achieves a 32.72% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's 3.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPDE.DE has underperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 9.33%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.
ZPDE.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 32.72%
- 6M
- 29.61%
- 1Y
- 43.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 21.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 51.11%
- 3Y*
- 29.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
ZPDE.DE vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPDE.DE SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 32.72% | -2.67% | 9.39% | -2.97% | 71.20% | 66.70% | -38.96% | 13.17% | -14.79% | -13.20% |
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 3.57% | 65.03% | 28.60% | -1.05% | 5.93% | -2.84% | 18.84% | 23.70% | 1.72% | -0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPDE.DE and GLTR is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015 | 0.09 |
The correlation between ZPDE.DE and GLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPDE.DE vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
ZPDE.DE
GLTR
ZPDE.DE vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDE.DE) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPDE.DE | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 1.89 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 4.30 | +3.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPDE.DE | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.43 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.76 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.68 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.41 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
ZPDE.DE vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPDE.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than GLTR's maximum drawdown of -42.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDE.DE and GLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPDE.DE | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -42.73% | -22.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.16% | -27.14% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.97% | -27.14% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.97% | -27.14% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.58% | -27.14% | -38.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -24.02% | +15.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.28% | -20.13% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.40% | 11.91% | -6.51% |
Volatility
ZPDE.DE vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDE.DE) is 7.53%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that ZPDE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPDE.DE | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 8.25% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | 33.72% | -13.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.96% | 35.94% | -11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 21.94% | +4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.89% | 19.05% | +9.84% |
ZPDE.DE vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPDE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZPDE.DE vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPDE.DE nor GLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPDE.DE and GLTR have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPDE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPDE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.
ZPDE.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while GLTR is Precious Metals. ZPDE.DE tracks S&P Energy Select Sector, while GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDE.DE and 0.60% for GLTR.
Find the right allocation for ZPDE.DE and GLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer