ZOMATO.NS vs. PAYTM.NS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ZOMATO.NS (Zomato Limited) and PAYTM.NS (One97 Communications Limited) are both stocks. ZOMATO.NS operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while PAYTM.NS operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ZOMATO.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in Zomato Limited (ZOMATO.NS) and One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ZOMATO.NS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PAYTM.NS

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: -18.51%
• 6M: -20.33%
• 1Y: 12.66%
• 3Y*: 14.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZOMATO.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZOMATO.NS Zomato Limited	0.00%	-22.61%	124.78%	108.60%	-55.73%	-13.41%
PAYTM.NS One97 Communications Limited	-18.51%	27.61%	60.18%	19.67%	-60.21%	-14.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ZOMATO.NS and PAYTM.NS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2021	0.22

Return for Risk

ZOMATO.NS vs. PAYTM.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYTM.NS

PAYTM.NS Risk / Return Rank: 51
PAYTM.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PAYTM.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PAYTM.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PAYTM.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
PAYTM.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZOMATO.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zomato Limited (ZOMATO.NS) and One97 Communications Limited (PAYTM.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZOMATO.NS	PAYTM.NS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.16	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ZOMATO.NS	PAYTM.NS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-82.37%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-29.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-67.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-41.15%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-54.62%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZOMATO.NS	PAYTM.NS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	35.53%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	51.76%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	51.76%	—

Dividends

ZOMATO.NS vs. PAYTM.NS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZOMATO.NS nor PAYTM.NS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZOMATO.NS and PAYTM.NS in my portfolio?

ZOMATO.NS and PAYTM.NS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.