ZOCT vs. NVDO
ZOCT (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
ZOCT vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZOCT achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.
ZOCT
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 7.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZOCT vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZOCT Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October | 2.64% | 2.04% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 18.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZOCT and NVDO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZOCT vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
ZOCT
NVDO
ZOCT vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZOCT | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZOCT | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.91 | 1.30 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
ZOCT vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZOCT drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZOCT and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZOCT | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -16.25% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -2.68% | +2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.34% | -4.99% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | — | — |
Volatility
ZOCT vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZOCT | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22% | 31.93% | -29.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.04% | 31.93% | -28.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.04% | 31.93% | -28.89% |
ZOCT vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZOCT vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
ZOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.02% | 16.66% |
ZOCT Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZOCT and NVDO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZOCT.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for ZOCT.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZOCT and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for ZOCT and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer