PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZNOV vs. ZOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZNOV vs. ZOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZNOV achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than ZOCT's 2.66% return.


ZNOV

1D
0.00%
1M
0.94%
YTD
2.87%
6M
3.23%
1Y
7.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.66%
6M
3.07%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZNOV vs. ZOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZNOV and ZOCT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024

0.77

The correlation between ZNOV and ZOCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZNOV vs. ZOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZNOV
ZNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ZNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ZNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ZOCT
ZOCT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ZOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZNOV vs. ZOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZNOVZOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.87

3.36

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.71

5.45

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.73

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

5.12

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.31

24.87

-2.56

ZNOV vs. ZOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the ZOCT Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZNOV and ZOCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZNOVZOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

3.36

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.90

1.91

-0.01

Drawdowns

ZNOV vs. ZOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZNOV drawdown since its inception was -3.31%, roughly equal to the maximum ZOCT drawdown of -3.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZNOV and ZOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZNOVZOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-3.18%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

-1.46%

-0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-0.34%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

0.30%

+0.05%

Volatility

ZNOV vs. ZOCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) has a higher volatility of 0.51% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) at 0.30%. This indicates that ZNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZNOVZOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

0.30%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

1.69%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65%

2.22%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.35%

3.05%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

3.05%

+0.30%

ZNOV vs. ZOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZNOV and ZOCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

ZNOV vs. ZOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZNOV nor ZOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZNOV and ZOCT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZNOV has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to ZOCT (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZNOV dropped -3.31% vs ZOCT's -3.18%.

On 1-year performance, ZNOV leads with 7.58% vs 7.43% for ZOCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ZOCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZNOV has performed better with a 7.58% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZNOV and ZOCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

ZNOV and ZOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ZOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZNOV and ZOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer