ZMUN vs. VTEB
ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) and VTEB (Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - ZMUN tracks the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index while VTEB tracks the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZMUN charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTEB.
Performance
ZMUN vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZMUN having a 1.88% return and VTEB slightly lower at 1.81%.
ZMUN
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTEB
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 6.66%
- 3Y*
- 3.49%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
ZMUN vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.88% | 0.67% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.81% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMUN and VTEB is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZMUN vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank
ZMUN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTEB
ZMUN vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZMUN | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.51 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZMUN vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, smaller than the maximum VTEB drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMUN and VTEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMUN | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.13% | -17.00% | +16.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.40% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -2.31% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.76% | — |
Volatility
ZMUN vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZMUN | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54% | 2.71% | -2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.54% | 3.90% | -3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.54% | 5.25% | -4.71% |
ZMUN vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZMUN has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZMUN vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison
ZMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than VTEB's 3.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.37% | 3.29% | 3.14% | 2.79% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 2.30% | 2.25% | 1.96% | 1.66% | 0.58% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.60% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZMUN and VTEB have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.
VTEB has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 2.60% for ZMUN.
ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index, while VTEB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZMUN and 0.03% for VTEB.
Find the right allocation for ZMUN and VTEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer